• Cruxifux@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    123
    ·
    10 days ago

    “As usual, leftists are championing a doomed cause” kids are literally getting mass murdered you fucking stupid piece of shit. What the absolute fuck is wrong with liberals?

      • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        9 days ago

        Honestly, in the past, I’ve been willing to lower my expectations for things based on the magical “political viability” threshold that only liberals seem to be able to see, but killing kids is just one that I just can’t for the life of me seem to get past. I know, it’s a weird one, and it’s a big ask, but I just don’t think we should genocide children.

      • Kieselguhr [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 days ago

        They have zero values, not even pragmatism. It is just sophistry to save the status quo.

        They are all for “lesser evil” if it’s about electing a neoliberal ghoul, but when the lesser evil would be not arming Ukraine and trying diplomacy, then they will be all for absolute moralism, because of “western values”

  • BeamBrain [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    103
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    As usual, leftists have championed a doomed cause

    Algeria: Liberated.
    Vietnam: Liberated.
    India: Liberated.
    Zimbabwe: Liberated.
    South Africa: Liberated.
    Ethiopia: Liberated.
    Burkina Faso: Liberated.
    Mexico: Liberated.
    Cuba: Liberated.
    Countless other former colonies: Liberated, liberated, liberated.

    But Contrapoints has said Palestine will never be free, so no-choice

    • sisatici [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      10 days ago

      She is consistent because she supports the sides that fought against their liberation. She is not gonna support liberation because she realised her side is against liberation and she chose to double down instead of stopping her wrongs

    • Outdoor_Catgirl [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      9 days ago

      Nat Turner’s(and countless others through history) slave revolution lost and they were killed. Should they have been content to remain enslaved because they wouldn’t win? Same for the Warsaw ghetto uprising, which she should care about since it was white Jews doing it.

  • glimmer_twin [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Didn’t read her liberal zio drivel. It thought I’d check the comments… why did I look at the comments… I was hoping some would be dragging her but it’s all just total parasocial sycophancy

    LMAO

    • thelastaxolotl [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      I both detest how the war is being carried out and also not wanting to join in calls to end the reichskommissariats and expel my friends and family from their homes in the lebensraum

      • Anarcho-Bolshevik@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        ·
        10 days ago

        Oh shit, shit, no no no no no no! You can’t compare it to the Third Reich! You’ll get on the Canary Mission if you do that! Look, write this instead:

        I both detest how the war is being carried out and also not wanting to join in calls to end the reichskommissariats commissariati and expel my friends and family from their homes in the lebensraum spazio vitale.

        Ahhhh… there, that’s better.

      • CloutAtlas [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        9 days ago

        There was a post from an Israeli settler who wants to leave Israel and to move back to the country where she was born, and ending it with “…but it’s hard to leave your home”

        They’re not paying any attention to the words coming out of their mouths. Head empty, just (fucked up) vibes.

  • Damarcusart [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    ·
    10 days ago

    There’s something just so vile about this sort of “Optics liberalism” where it’s more important to get “people” on “your side” than it is to actually stand for anything. That being inane and inoffensive is more important than actually making a difference. This idea that actually wanting to do something about a problem is just as bad as the problem itself, this insistence on tiny, incremental steps towards “change” instead of actually doing something about a problem. The sheer spinelessness of it all, while acting like she is “brave” for going against leftist opinion about Palestine and being pro"a bit less genocide, as long as we say Hamas is just as bad." something that might’ve flown 2-3 years ago, but Israel is far too mask off now, even most libs recognise it. No wonder Hillary Clinton is her best friend, they’re both just as tone deaf as each other.

    • xiaohongshu [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      ·
      10 days ago

      She’s not tone deaf lol. I bet you she gets giddy just thinking about how her deliberately contrarian post just triggered thousands and thousands of angry leftists out there.

      • Damarcusart [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        ·
        10 days ago

        That’s a good point, she probably carefully crafted this specifically to piss off as many people as possible so she could play the victim, just like her Zionist buddies. She’ll carefully comb the responses to this for anyone saying anything openly anti-semitic or transphobic and use that as proof that she is right and justify her Zionism further.

    • purpleworm [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      10 days ago

      For some reason I didn’t make the connection before, but if we pretend that she’s trying to be progressive, her argument is tailism. She’s not trying to get people on her side, she’s deciding her side based on where she thinks more people already are without any interest in agitating for people to develop better positions, to benefit a good cause rather than just a popular one (and anti-zionism is characterized as unpopular at first before calling it popular to accuse it of giving Nazis cover). It’s a perfect microcosm of her politics, where she thinks “having power” means conforming to the group that has power so they support you, as though you can thereby accomplish anything but what that group was already doing.

    • Collatz_problem [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      10 days ago

      sunday-friend

      Heartache is powerful, but democracy is subtle. Incrementally, you begin to notice a change in the weather. When it snows, the flakes are softer when they stick to your worry-worn forehead. When it rains, the rain is warmer. Democracy is coming to the Administrative Region. The ideals of Dolorian humanism are reinstating themselves. How can they not? These are the ideals of the Coalition and the Moralist International. Those guys are signal blue. And they’re not only good – they’re also powerful. What will it be like, once their nuanced plans have been realized?

      The Kingdom of Conscience will be exactly as it is now. Moralists don’t really have beliefs. Sometimes they stumble on one, like on a child’s toy left on the carpet. The toy must be put away immediately. And the child reprimanded. Centrism isn’t change – not even incremental change. It is control. Over yourself and the world. Exercise it. Look up at the sky, at the dark shapes of Coalition airships hanging there. Ask yourself: is there something sinister in moralism? And then answer: no. God is in his heaven. Everything is normal on Earth.

  • SchillMenaker [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    10 days ago

    The online left has been posting photographic evidence of deliberate and continued atrocities

    People are getting mad at the people committing and defending these atrocities

    This is beyond useless

    • emeralddawn45@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      “Yeah the atrocities are awful and all, but the real problem is the discourse around it. If everyone would just stop sharing pictures and talking about it and thinking about it then I, personally, would be a lot happier. I just don’t thi k its constructive ya kno?”

  • hello_hello [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Separating decent people from genocidal fascists.

    Someone should tell her:

    Poll: Overwhelming majority of Jewish Israelis share genocidal belief there are ‘no innocent people in Gaza’

    Echoing the words of martyr Aaron Bushnell, What would you have done during the holocaust: you’re doing it right now.

    • WhyEssEff [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      66
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      like this is the shit ‘progressives’ at my synagogue say when I am openly non-receptive in these conversations. this is “I don’t want to get into an argument so I’m going to wax about how tragic it all is and how there’s ‘hate from both ends’ but hyperfocus on the ‘wrongdoings’ of the pro-Palestinians and hope that you think my response is conciliatory enough not to make this an issue”

  • purpleworm [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    I don’t really know why I bothered to write this, but I’ll post it anyway:

    As usual, leftists have championed a doomed cause

    What the fuck do you champion with your platform, Nat? Congratulations on being a pioneering voice in letting us know that 4channers are bad, congrats on your incredible victory that has long stopped reaching anyone who didn’t already understand that, now what about the imperialism that characterizes the global order? Oh, right, opposing it is infeasible because Dems won’t vote for it.

    It’s crazy how she says that anti-Zionism is necessarily a losing battle with a “shrunken” coalition relative to the “coalition” that includes lib zios, but then a few lines later acknowledges that “Anti-Zionist” as a label is “now-popular,” but only to talk about Nazis using the title. So it’s hopelessly unpopular when it comes to doing good things but powerfully mainstream for doing bad things, with no causal differentiation.

    God, I already hate her, but the fact that she would just come out and attack anti-zionism overall is somewhat more reactionary than I expected, albeit a more honest version of what I assumed her opinion would be.

    [In reference to documentation of the genocide and these images upsetting people] Antisemitism and Anti-Zionism are conceptually not the same, and conflating them is dangerous. But . . .

    She did the meme. Continued:

    But in practice, the way Israel is perceived does seep out into attitudes toward Jews in general. I don’t think Jews who feel isolated and wary in the current atmosphere are simply hysterical or hallucinating.

    Yes, there’s communal trauma and hypervigilance. Yes, there’s disingenuous rightwing ghouls dismissing and censoring all criticism of Israel on the pretext of “fighting antisemitism.” But there’s also a valid fear of historical antisemitic patterns recurring, and that fear gives power to the rightwing Zionist claim that only Israel can keep Jews safe.

    Does this mean Israel cannot be criticized and sanctioned? Absolutely not.

    But it’s something I don’t want to risk contributing to if not outweighed by tangible benefits. So, I approached the issue cautiously.

    For the first time in years, Nat demonstrates concerns about tangible benefits and the risks of playing into reactionary tropes, something that has never occurred to her when she bashes communists (both anarchists and MLs, especially Mao for some reason).

    I can absolutely see how this looks Reasonable and like she’s being The Adult in the Room if you’re a liberal, and my criticism of this is something it’s pretty easy to handwave if you are motivated by liking her output and being overly charitable, but one of the more awful parts about this, and the reason I transcribed that segment in full, is that she is completely vague about “rightwing ghouls” and does not make clear at all in this statement how Israel itself and its entire fucking edifice is based on the conflation that she’s talking about, that she’s talking about the end result of the primary defensive strategy of hasbarists. She can’t say this, because then her statement would amount to “Israel is using Jews as human shields, so I can’t attack Israel because then I’d be endangering the human shields. Never mind that millions of people coming to harm was already the status quo and I could try to help interfere, Israel’s hostage-taking has immobilized me, even though my hypothetical long-winded video essay would never have a message that could be conflated with Nazi-style antisemitism regardless.” She can’t say this because she would sound completely ridiculous. (I said “Nazi-style” because I think she could pretty easily produce some zionist-style antisemitism and gets close to doing it even here with the nebulous connection between “Israel” and “Jews in general” she draws in the first part of the last quote).

    Edit: Also, “historical antisemitic patterns reoccuring” isn’t going to come from the crowd of Leftists in keffiyehs! They aren’t the ones who will go hunt down all the Jews for betraying Jesus or preventing their country’s glorious victory in the Great War. The Zionist crowd is the one who would produce such action, though in practice in a place like America we are far from there structurally (not that stochastic attacks are acceptable, but those were already going on and the evidence presented of them increasing in number is muddled by zio misreporting, and very little compared to both systemic and stochastic Islamophobic attacks, something she never even hints at existing).

    Zero Palestinian lives were saved. Not one fewer bomb or bullet was fired by the IDF.

    Then why “quietly” donate to charities, Nat? Zero people were saved? Did all the fundraising, all the relocated refugees, not accomplish anything at all? Or are you just so obsessed with depicting people to your left as useless that you’d cynically misrepresent an ongoing genocide to score points? Never mind the sabotage and pressure campaigns that did actually concretely stop shipments to Israel, albeit not on the totalizing scale we would hope for.

    It may have slightly contributed to the reelection of Trump, guaranteeing that the US will put not diplomatic pressure on Netanyahu for at least four years,

    First of all, if the war factored into the election, it was the fault of the Democrats for being zionists, not the fault of voters being less enthusiastic for a zionist. Do you not understand how voting is even theoretically supposed to work? This is a real “the Democrats can only be failed” argument.

    Oh yeah, and it was an open secret for over a year now that the Biden admin was putting no pressure on Bibi, and somewhat recently became fully a non-secret because Israeli politicians have been bragging about it! I sure wonder there’s some other motivation here that has resulted in you putting forth these blatant falsehoods to, and it can’t be stressed enough, smear the opposition to a genocide!

    Trump is also, incidentally, a menace to me and basically everyone I care about. A perfectly enlightened being would feel no bitterness about this, but I do.

    This could be the entire post. Just these two sentences, rephrased slightly for context.

    What about the people who are menaced by the Dems as well? Oh, sorry, some voteblues showed me a trolley problem meme and I realized that solidarity isn’t the best way to optimize for my well-being on the timescale of one election cycle, so forget about those other people.

    None of this is the fault of the Palestinians, of course, who are overwhelmingly the victims here.

    Bless your heart. We all know that you’re posting this as a bitter tirade against the anglosphere left, you don’t need to say it via negativa too.

    I hope that someday American policy will shift in their favor, and I will continue to support that cause.

    I hope this requires no comment for how pathetic and disingenuous this statement is.

    I see the situation as bleak, intractable, extremely divisive . . .

    Die in a ditch, Natalie.

    • GoodGuyWithACat [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      ·
      10 days ago

      Yup, classic liberal where they say they condemn genocide but their main point is to belittle leftists who have actual moral consistency. If you ever need to show a prime example of pearl clutching it’s this post.

    • Mardoniush [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      10 days ago

      I really fucking hate that “encouraging antisemitism” take.

      I have personally, literally punched Nazis and the only other people I know of who have also done this have been communists and anarchists. I have stood proudly beside Jewish comrades for a thousand causes including stopping the genocide.

      What liberals like her truly hate is that we take their vaunted moral universalism seriously, while they see constant hypocritical “pragmatic” reasons for cowardly betraying everything every committed liberal from Robespierre to John Stuart Mill stood for.

      Because doing anything else would be hard. They might lose. That wouldn’t be entertaining. It wouldn’t be good narrative framing.

      It shows in how we love the great liberal heroes while she makes videos about how they were like super mean to girl boss princess who was irl trying to invent the Black Hundreds a century ahead of schedule.

      I don’t hate Natalie. I quite like her, we have very similar interests. But I have absolute contempt for her as an agent.

  • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    As usual leftists have championed a doomed cause

    Perhaps Contra will end up being correct. But, do the Palestinians want us to do anything else? The Palestinians I have spoken to have sometimes resigned themselves to the idea that they might have a doomed cause, have they asked me to stop championing that cause? No. Why? Every single one of them wants to TRY.

    And that’s what matters. That you try.

    Andor’s Nemik speech is extremely fitting here. It may be true that many causes are doomed to fail, but each and every single act of trying is creating more people that are united in the cause of opposing the empire. Ghorman is a doomed cause from the start, there was no saving it even if they had the entire enemy plan it would be carried out effectively, but what its doom creates is millions if not tens of millions of people in opposition to the empire.

    The very same can be said of Palestine. They may be doomed, or they may not be, but speaking of doom is not useful. TRY.

    Contra does not want to try because it does not benefit her liberal politics. She is a supporter of the empire, not opposition to it, and she knows that our attempts to try create people that are to the left of her, which is not beneficial to her cause.

    the way Israel is perceived does seep out into attitudes towards jews in general

    No it does not. This is completely bullshit. The antisemites will have that attitude towards jews regardless of the situation in Palestine, and everyone else will immediately love every jew who says “i am not a zionist”. The only jews affected by this situation are zionists, they are not affected because they are jews, they are affected because they are zionists. Every single one of them can disarm any negativity towards themselves immediately by saying they’re anti zionist.


    And finally I just want to point out that this whole post exists to disguise the fact she’s admitting that her position is two-state zionism but without actually saying Palestinians should have a state.

    • Damarcusart [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      9 days ago

      And finally I just want to point out that this whole post exists to disguise the fact she’s admitting that her position is two-state zionism but without actually saying Palestinians should have a state.

      Her position really does seem to be “I wish my Zionist buddies would just hurry up and finish them off already so I can stop pretending to care about this.”

      Also, how did you do that page break thing?

    • catonkatonk [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      It’s not a doomed cause. We know the dismantling of apartheid ethnostates can happen, because we have done it before. The only doomed solution is the “two-state” solution that would be acceptable to the likes of Nicaraguan Contra Points: One in which Palestinians are permanently dispossessed and under the military thumb of an oppressive regime that they have no voice over. The only outcome of that solution is further violence. The only way to prevent mass violence is to allow the presence of justice.

    • CleverOleg [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      I saw a take on Reddit about her that I really liked, and it applies to so many others:

      Leftish or socialist-lite people like Natalie do genuinely like the idea of a socialist or at least much more fair and just society. To them, it’s a very nice and pleasant thought. But that’s where it stops for them. They don’t want to think about what it takes to get there. They want to treat a potential better world like a Barbie Dream House; something that’s basically just escapism from the hell we live in now. This is especially easy for libs in the imperial core to do because while we are in hell, our hell is much more comfortable than that of say, the Palestinians or many other people in the periphery. It’s Utopianism, in other words.

      And that’s why they hate tankies, because our focus is on how to actually get there. We support China or support Russia’s and Iran’s anti-imperialist actions because it moves the ball forward. They are concrete actions that are necessary to get to that better world. But focusing on the works involved spoils the happy little dream the libs have. Socialism is supposed to be something that will spontaneously appear without struggle or bloodshed. Being told otherwise spoils the dream for them.

    • Kopfrkingl [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      why wont anyone think about the zionists :(

      This is essentially what she is saying. That’s not the point KKKontrapoints; you’re not smart for being a contrarian asshole and saying “actually everyone is suffering”. How does she sleep at night calling herself progressive but slobbering on colonialists’ boots — if it was any people of the past that did such activities she wouldn’t hesitate calling them colonialists — as they should be — and go on a tirade about their faults, but when it happens at present she needs a “measured response”; there is no “measured response” against a state that thinks bombing hospitals is a just cause; also, she seems to think that Israel is a rational nation that would’ve adopted a two-state solution if “liberals” didn’t oppose it — get your head out of our ass Natalie, there is a world outside of your cult-like fanbase that isn’t at all in congruence with your views and it doesn’t grovel before your centrist hodge-podge of nonsense.