Update


Comrade Beetle, who is person informed by local orgs told us the following:

As far as I know all activist groups in The Netherlands that want to break the ties mostly communicate via instagram (not ideal), and this news hasn’t been picked up by Dutch media. @utrechtuni4palestine released a statement on instagram that explains the situation pretty well.

Here’s the most recent statement from Utrecht University that talks about the current policy, which is to continue current collaborations (except for 1 with a government agency) but to not start new collaborations for now: https://www.uu.nl/en/news/adjusted-statement-executive-board-and-deans

On https://academiccomplicity.nl/ you can find all public collaborations from Dutch universities with Israeli institutions.

I live in The Netherlands so I keep up with all university policies and actions by students and staff relating ties to israel.

It seems that the rector of the university lied to the press.


Old Article

The Netherlands’ Utrecht University has made history by becoming the first academic institution in the Western world to implement a full academic boycott of Israel.

The landmark decision, announced by Rector Wilco Hazeleger, follows months of sustained pressure from students and staff demanding action over Israel’s conduct in Gaza.

In a statement issued at the start of the new academic year on Monday, September 1, Hazeleger confirmed that the university has “effectively stopped or suspended all institutional collaborations with Israeli parties and will not start any new collaborations.” The boycott will remain in place “until further notice.”

Describing the move as a “moral necessity,” Hazeleger acknowledged the severity of the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. “The situation in the world, and in Gaza in particular, requires us to act with a moral compass. There is great human suffering,” he said.

While reiterating the importance of academic freedom and open dialogue, the rector drew a clear line between academic cooperation and complicity in state violence. “It is also clear when there is genocidal violence and a line has been crossed.”

While Utrecht’s leadership has acknowledged the inherent tension between academic collaboration and ethical responsibility, Hazeleger concluded that the scale of the crisis demanded decisive action. “This is a moment when the university must stand firmly on the side of justice and human dignity,” he said.

The decision follows months of persistent campaigning by Utrecht University students and staff, who have held demonstrations and issued formal appeals demanding the institution sever ties with Israeli academic bodies in protest of Israel’s military operations in Gaza and its occupation of Palestinian territories.

The university’s stance aligns closely with the goals of the Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel (PACBI), which welcomed the move.

In a statement posted online, PACBI called the boycott “a historic step that shatters a long-standing taboo in Western academia,” adding that it represents the fruit of “principled, strategic work by students and university staff.”

The campaign group has urged other institutions across Europe and North America to follow Utrecht’s example. “University administrators have no excuses,” PACBI said. “Basic ethical principles and the rulings of the International Court of Justice require urgent action in response to the Palestinian call for boycott until Israel ends its assault on Gaza and respects fundamental Palestinian rights.”

Israel launched its latest military campaign in Gaza on October 7, 2023, following a surprise operation by Palestinian armed groups. According to Gaza’s Health Ministry, the conflict has since claimed the lives of at least 63,633 Palestinians, with more than 160,000 injured.

  • Beetle [hy/hym]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    7 days ago

    This is not true, the university still has ties with Israeli institutions through ongoing horizon projects. The actual ‘landmark decision’ is that they used the term boycott for their policy to stop collaborations with Israeli governmental institutions. It shows another shift in the political climate where talking about a boycott on Israel is no longer considered controversial.

    • rainpizza@lemmygrad.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 days ago

      Damn 😞 Thanks for the clarification. If you have a source that goes into detail on this, could you share it so I can update the post?

      • Beetle [hy/hym]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        As far as I know all activist groups in The Netherlands that want to break the ties mostly communicate via instagram (not ideal), and this news hasn’t been picked up by Dutch media. @utrechtuni4palestine released a statement on instagram that explains the situation pretty well.

        Here’s the most recent statement from Utrecht University that talks about the current policy, which is to continue current collaborations (except for 1 with a government agency) but to not start new collaborations for now: https://www.uu.nl/en/news/adjusted-statement-executive-board-and-deans

        On https://academiccomplicity.nl/ you can find all public collaborations from Dutch universities with Israeli institutions.

        I live in The Netherlands so I keep up with all university policies and actions by students and staff relating ties to israel.

        • rainpizza@lemmygrad.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 days ago

          I tried looking for myself other articles but all of them echo this one. Maybe, Beetle knows more information in dutch?

          • Maeve@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            7 days ago

            Maybe, I just find more than ever, we can’t really take media at face value. It’s always been true that states’ media always played up the best of their homelands and downplayed the worst, but it seems more brazen lying with a veneer of veracity, or I am extremely jaded.

            • Beetle [hy/hym]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              7 days ago

              To be honest I don’t think media is deliberately lying here. They’re taking a statement from the rector of the university and assume it’s true without proper research (which is bad but unfortunately common). The rector lied when he called it a boycott.

            • rainpizza@lemmygrad.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              7 days ago

              It’s okay. It is normal to feel jaded sometimes. As for this article that I posted, I am not sure yet if it is lie until I get a solid source from Beetle. However, it is great to have the skills taught by CriticalResist in his substack regarding media literacy. I usually come back to it when I need a refresher:

              Hope it helps you! It helped me throughout this journey as a marxist to read information from diverse media.

              • Maeve@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                6 days ago

                Thanks so much for the reminder. I’ve seen these but a refresher is indeed in order. I will bookmark these and hopefully remember to return periodically.