Hello lovelies! Everything is a lot lately, but we’re here to cheer you on and let you know that we are here with you. You are beautiful, you are loved, and you matter. 
Friendly reminder to please use
spoiler tags and content warnings [cw]
for sensitive content that falls under Hexbear’s Code of Conduct.
As always, we ask that in order to participate in the weekly megathread, one self-identifies as some form of disabled, which is broadly defined in the community sidebar:
“Disability” is an umbrella term which encompasses physical disabilities, emotional/psychiatric disabilities, neurodivergence, intellectual/developmental disabilities, sensory disabilities, invisible disabilities, and more. You do not have to have an official diagnosis to consider yourself disabled.
Mask up, love one another, and stay alive for one more week.
I think the definition of “inhuman monster” is the interesting crux here. The the origin of inhuman is probably ableist (I’m sure, I just don’t know for certain), I don’t see it much used in a “not human genetically speaking” kind of way. I guess the effect of the word is very much changed with common usage for a lot of people, leading to mean “Someone who willfully and knowningly behaves against the best interests of other humans and/or harms them”. From what you two describe, I think the word that has the meaning of dehumanization is probably “non-human”.
It’s semantics, let’s be real, and I don’t think either variant is good. But for me, using inhuman in that sense of actively working against humans actually feels pretty apt. I like using it on people like Musk, Thiel, Besos and the likes. Material conditions allowed them to change and become antagonistic against their fellow people, and they chose to do so. I hope we can come up with a derogatory word to put with bourgeois that isn’t ableist in origin tho.