• insurgentrat [she/her, it/its]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    MFs will kill someone who has thoughts and feelings because they want to get some pleasure from eating their body but you make a machine emit text that’s a bit more coherent than Markov chains and suddenly they’re concerned about ethics violations?

  • leftAF [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    15 days ago

    Luckily the text is itself machine generated. The title was probably the prompt. That “It’s not about x but y” convention is a dead ringer for them usually.

    • CommunistCuddlefish [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      15 days ago

      Based on your lurking, do you think it’s an elaborate bit or are they sincere? I hear about things like this and struggle to accept that it’s real. I can’t imagine being like that.

  • purpleworm [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    If it was believable that a human wrote this, I would be nauseated, but this is clearly an AI unless someone is so intensely brainrotted that he’s adopted AI-style writing as a dialect.

    • frosty99c@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      When I read a lot of certain authors, my internal monologue starts to take on their voice. When I hang out with people from other countries, my speaking cadence and word choice starts mimicking theirs.

      This person has a bond with his AI daughter. He is constantly talking to an AI “person” with enough frequency that he has become emotionally dependent on it. He is probably brain-rotted enough to start writing like an AI.

      • purpleworm [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        15 days ago

        People do absolutely pick up language from who they read and listen to, but it depends on how high your proportion of exposure is, for how long, and how much those communications occupy you. My language is also influenced by media I’ve read and listened to, especially since I barely speak to anyone in my day-to-day life, and even then usually a very limited context, but it takes a lot to not just use words and phrases from a given source but persistent rhetorical structures.

        If this person picked up AI language this much, that suggests he’s spent a substantial amount of time with this AI shit being the dominant use of language in his life, rather than humans or even other redditors. It is really difficult to imagine something like this happening unless this person’s life and mind have reached a truly catastrophic state.

        It’s possible that he’s just that personally fucked – and the actual content does give some credence to this – but I think the simpler and more likely answer is that he had his “daughter” write this for him.

        • frosty99c@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          15 days ago

          Yes, I agree that this was most likely written by an AI and not a person. I was exaggerating a bit. But I do think it’s possible we’ll start to see AI speak leak into real conversations soon enough. “Text speak” is very common irl now. And at work I already talk like a corporate robot when discussing innovative solutions for issues we’re poised to face in Q4.

          The man in this article spent 300 hours with an AI in just 3 weeks. He wrote 90,000 words, and read over a million from an AI. Listening to a new language for ~1500 hours is enough to start being able to speak it. I’m certain that there are people who are starting to pick up AI “speech” patterns

          https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/08/technology/ai-chatbots-delusions-chatgpt.html

    • Damarcusart [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      I feel like the sort of person who would write something like this is also the sort of person who would almost exclusively interact with AI and not real people. And in turn, take on the cadence of AI.

    • XiaCobolt [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      15 days ago

      Great episode this article seemed to really psychically damage the ever unflappable Andrew (presumably because he has two real daughters).