Games on Linux are great now this is why I fully moved to Linux. Is the the work place Pc’s market improving.

  • Bronstein_Tardigrade@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Do the same thing for CAD software engineers that was done for gamers and gaming. Quality CAD software would move companies to make the switch. Once people use it at work and school, they’ll use it at home. I’m hoping the Chinese government’s move to Linux will lead to their investing in FreeCAD.

  • mub@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    Adding my voice to the hardware compatibility issue. While most hardware just works, Linux usually lacks the ability to configure the device. Audio interfaces are a good example of this. They work but you can’t set the sample rate or enable any custom features on ANY of them.

    I believe government regulators should step in and require hardware manufacturers to provide Linux support equal to Windows or Mac. This could be relaxed for low volume or highly specialised devices, but mainstream consumer stuff should be more universal.

  • randomaside@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    This most difficult one is probably the fact that 99% of people do not install their operating system.

    The device they purchase needs to have a clean and elegant out of box experience like the Mac. Regular folk who are willing to stray from windows don’t consider any computer that doesn’t come off the shelf with sane defaults. Everything else is arcane to them.

    We are not those people. I have to remind myself that not everyone likes to build their own systems.

    I do have a friend who wants to buy a framework laptop with Fedora on it because that’s what they use in the Laboratory he works in but he doesn’t want to assemble it himself he just wants it to come like that.

    I think we’re getting there finally.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    People who convince themselves they “just aren’t good with computers.”

    In the early 2000s, it was widely thought that everyone who grew up with them would be reasonably competent with them. We now have 20-30 year olds who are still stumped with basic computing concepts like how to reset a forgotten password. I literally ran into this a couple of months ago: Really? You haven’t had to do this a dozen times in your life by now? How did you finish college (this person was highly educated)?

  • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    Come pre installed. As much as it pains me, LTT guy is probably right to a degree as well. Shit needs to work without tinkering. Personally I don’t mind some tinkering - enjoy it even. But the average Joanne does not.

    • cattywampas@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Correct, the average person just wants shit to work out of the box. This goes for computers, dishwashers, cars, coffee machines, everything.

  • Carl [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I think the big thing that everyone is missing here is that schools and workplaces need to push it into people’s lives. For that to happen Linux (or at least one of its distros backed by a hardware distributor) needs to develop killer features for those markets and successfully sell to them in large enough numbers that the average computer user - who does not care what their OS is because they only use it for email and work - will make sure that their at-home setup is compatible with their work machine.

    That moment is when market forces will take over and drive real growth in desktop Linux, rather than the tiny little bumps we’ve seen the past few years thanks to the Steam Deck coming out and MS pissing its users off.

    This is how Apple built its marketshare against the Microsoft domination of the 90s. For a long time it was the go-to “school computer”, and then those kids grew up and now a huge piece of the tech industry and culture is more or less Apple only. It’s unclear if this process can be repeated, since Apple’s marketshare was carved out during a time of massive growth in the industry that is unlikely to repeat, but I wouldn’t say it’s impossible if the right conditions reveal themselves.

    I will say that it is highly unlikely that the people here would like the change if it happens - imagine Google slinging fully locked down “linux” machines en masse and everybody else needing to download their kernel fork that’s loaded with spyware (“for security reasons”) in order to connect to Google Teams for work. Maybe I’m being pessimistic but I just don’t see mass adoption of a new OS happening without some kind of fuckery like this that renders the version of Linux that gets mass adopted unrecognizable from the version we’re all using now.

    The other option is state intervention, as with NeoKylin in China, although the Chinese government seems to be limiting themselves to just government computers with that distro.

    • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      At work us devs and IT folks use both windows and RHEL Linux. I’d say I use windows for business apps and Linux for everything development related except for terminal apps and visual studio. My database work is pretty much 100% linux. Everyone else in the company is likely using windows.

  • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    This question comes up every other week. I reject the premise that “more users” is a commonly held objective.

    For most linux / OSS projects the objective is to be the best the project can be. Having an active community is usually part of that but “more users” is a low priority.

  • Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    Two things:

    1. Obviously it needs to come pre-installed. This is a really tough hurdle to overcome and I’m not sure how it can be.
    2. Security needs a lot of work if Linux is going to lose the small-target advantage.
  • arsCynic@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Either:

    1. A smarter and wiser population able to discern and care enough that they’re being cucked by Microsoft, overcoming the inertia to install Linux.
    2. Linux invents a game/feature that is so goddamn appealing that everyone wants in on the action.
    3. Preinstallation.
  • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    CAD software.

    FreecCAD just released it’s first full version and it’s a pain to use. Back in 2018 somebody said FOSS CAD software was at least ten years behind the big windows commercial software. I think now it’s about fifteen behind.

  • rmuk@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    In Enterprise: manageability. It’s hard to overstate how powerful Windows Group Policy is. Being able to configure every single aspect of the OS and virtually all major applications, Microsoft or otherwise, using a single application that can apply rules dynamically based on user, device, user or device groups, time of day, location, battery level, form factor, etc, etc. Nothing on Linux comes close, especially when simplicity is a factor, and until it does most large organisations won’t touch it with a barge pole.

    • RavenofDespair@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      More users means more people growing up using it and wanting to be developers. More users means more companys making software that runs on Linux

  • daisykutter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    I think it is its image of lack of stability and features; I know there are out there stable distros and almost every well known program has a Linux version, but the image that Linux has had through the years is not that. If Linux overcomes this and gets a better reputation, it would be a great weight lifted for the road ahead of the OS. I hope Proton breaks through the mainstream public and Linux gets more exposed and known out there