

You need 1000 fps for zero motion blur, but nobody has a 1000 Hz display.


You need 1000 fps for zero motion blur, but nobody has a 1000 Hz display.


I don’t understand the deals and I’m not sure the terms are even public, but they apparently negotiated something like first purchase rights or a guaranteed price on up to 40% of the wafers to be produced. This of course caused every other big RAM customer to panic buy all at once as soon as it was announced.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BORRBce5TGw
OpenAI bought 40% of all the RAM in the world for the next year.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sJI3qTb2ze8&pp=0gcJCQMKAYcqIYzv
Extremely self-congratulatory tech insider, but puts the specs in context. It’s about as powerful as a $600 laptop, which is the most he expects it to sell for.
Valve only claims “6 times the performance of a Steam Deck” in the announcement, which isn’t all that much depending on how that’s measured. Still way faster than an Xbox, though.
https://testufo.com/persistence
The difference between 60 and 120 Hz and even between 120 and 240 Hz is blatantly obvious in this example. It’s about replicating the effect of looking out the side window of a moving car, not just the illusion of motion (which movies do well enough at 24 fps).