CoolerOpposide [none/use name]

  • 6 Posts
  • 158 Comments
Joined 5 years ago
cake
Cake day: December 9th, 2020

help-circle




  • Iran has quite a few tricks up their sleeves. Unless America keeps ships so far out of range that it significantly reduces their usefulness in combat, they WILL face the drone/missile storms that they have lost every single war game simulation against. I don’t think anybody here is under any illusion that Iran could 1v1 the U.S. and come out on top of things militarily and economically, even on its own turf, but Iran certainly can make the war very costly in capital, and political capital both domestically and internationally. Nobody likes to stick in a messy, disastrous war where you aren’t the defender. Iran would make the unpopularity of the Iraq war look like a joke. There’s no 9/11 to rally behind. US troop morale is regularly at record lows. Recruitment will fall deeper into the shitter. Iran has stated they will be mining the Strait of Hormuz if direct conflict with the U.S. breaks out. The strongest card Iran really holds is economic. The can make the global economy scream if they need to.

    Lots of disparaging comments here surrounding China, but I’m sure if conflict escalates to the point the US is direct, China would absolutely not mind providing material support insofar as Iran needs it to keep the U.S. navy occupied or better yet, sunk. It is no secret that field testing of combined missile and drone warfare against the U.S. navy would naturally be something China wants to see play out as frequently as possible.









  • I believe it’s already too late for Iran to pull that off, let alone technologically feasible for them. I don’t know what the answer is, and unfortunately I think the best answer might be sit down and negotiate with the U.S. now before millions potentially die and the genocide of Gaza has zero hope of being ended. If Iran strikes US bases and does not have direct material support from Russia or China, there is really only delaying the inevitable in a war with the U.S.: absolute ruin of Iranian infrastructure in some of the most difficult to navigate terrain in the world, and utter devastation of their military assets that let them have any chance of standing against western imperialist action in the future.

    That doesn’t mean the U.S. will win, achieve regime change, or occupy parts of Iran, but it does mean that Iran will be fucked beyond all recognition for a long, long time. Iran either needs to demonstrate a nuclear test in a remote place within Iran TONIGHT or sit down and negotiate, and I would go as far as to say that it should not even hesitate to accept terms up to no longer launching missiles at Israel.







  • If the U.S. gets involved there is a 0% chance things go nuclear unless Iran sinks a carrier, then there is a slightly more than zero chance the U.S. tests a nuke or something to demonstrate to other world powers (China) that sinking a carrier could be met with a nuclear response.

    If the U.S. doesn’t get involved, also a 0% chance nukes get used. Iran won’t for obviously reasons, the most obvious of which is they almost certainly don’t have one, and Israel won’t because their nukes exist purely as theatre for a defense against an existential threat to the existence of Israel.

    The one, insane but unlikely caveat here is that Iranian state media made a statement a few minutes ago saying “there will be a surprise tonight that the world will remember for centuries.”

    It would be insane, but if Iran has some kind of credible intelligence that a U.S. attack is 100% imminent, I could see Iran feasibly running a nuclear test somewhere remote within Iran as a deterrent. That would easily be one of the craziest geopolitical events since WWII though, considering there is a fair amount of intelligence surrounding Iran’s nuclear programs, and an entire secret refining/nuke building facility would be near impossible to pull off