BanMeFromPosting [none/use name]

  • 1 Post
  • 25 Comments
Joined 17 days ago
cake
Cake day: December 12th, 2025

help-circle


  • “Fun house” is bit of a lacking interpretation. It’s a sort of danish triple-entendre. The Danish word is “lysthus” - Literally translated it would be joy-house.
    However “lyst” in this context could both mean “joy” and “lust”.

    Furthermore “lysthus” doesnt refer to a bordello or something like that, but a closed pavillon - A gazebo with walls. But because “lysthus” litteraly means “lusthouse” it has been used as a metaphor for bordellos and the like at times.

    So then you come to “kommunister i lysthuset” where you’re both playing on the imagery of a closed pavillon and the literal word, in order to make the transferrence you’re talking about a vagina.
    I love it.


  • So on the one hand we have clearly flawed accusations of genocide from a country with a long history of using such accusations to advance it’s own geopolitical goals, fabricated by people who are doing their best to kill Muslims all over the world, but they’re apparently extremely worried about this group for some reason.

    On the other hand we have those dastardly conniving Asians who have the support of 72 filthy untrustworthy Muslim countries saying no genocide is occuring.
    Oh and all the independent observators who have visited and reported no genocide is ongoing. Don’t believe them? Go for yourself! The region is free to travel.

    Yeah real headscratcher. Both sides and so on. Can’t trust anyone.

    Have you actually read the report?
    It’s based on the account of 6 “anonymous” Uyghurs who were asked how many people were disappeared from their village. This number was then used to extrapolate to represent the entire Uyghur population.
    It also argues that children not born, because women have access to contraceptives, are part of the genocide. This is weird because we apparently can’t trust what China says is going on in the region, but we can use their numbers for the region? Okie dokie. Also the Uyghurs were never under the one child policy, which strikes me as counter productive if you wanna genocide a group.


  • I do condemn it. I condemn the US for giving aid to militant jihadist terrorgroups in the Xinjiang province with the purpose of destabilising the region.
    I condemn Adrian Zenz and all his ilk for his “divine anti-communist mission” and for pretending to be an expert on a country youve visited once and the language of which you dont speak.
    I condemn all the redditors for their sophomoric approach to life where they pretend to be experts on a subject they’ve never investigated beyond the state department propaganda shoved in their face every day.
    I condemn China for not being perfect in it’s administration of the anti-radicalisation programmes I guess.

    Have you actually read the “report” about the “Uyghur genocide”? Have you read the “Xinjiang police files”? Or are you just so insulated in the western echo chamber you don’t even know of them?




  • Honestly no idea, i just put it at them because Clinton came in after the USSR was gone and kinda did the shock doctrine thing thing in the east.
    Bush seemed to be too much of a yokel, only really pulling that whole “coalition of the willing” thing. Didn’t seem like he really advanced the sublimation of the EU that much.
    Obama comes around and gets the PRISM/5 eyes thing going and I gotta be honest I blame everything Joe did in Europa on Obama as well, because I cannot imagine them going along if he didn’t have that “HOPE” shine. The whole NSA Snowden leak should’ve been a massive deal. It revealed the US spied and wiretapped the offices of European leaders. But it wasn’t. It was just laughed away. Don’t think it would’ve been under Bush, Hillary or Trump. But it was under Obama.

    Under Trump 1 several European states started seriously arguing for a European army. Trump 2 it seems like they’re not though. Now they’re just going along to get along or something. Real Gorbachev vibes.

    I dunno a lot about it, it’s completely vibes based. Seems to me like the EU member nations really admired Obama. Thought he was cool. Clinton did eastern Europe.

    It’s not like other presidents didn’t also do stuff, moreso the whole “getting the lambs to slaughter themselves” kinda thing. Joe Biden too i guess, but that guy is a rotting corpse so it doesn’t fit with my vibes analysis so I choose to ignore it, as is good academic practice.