Even if it wasn’t written by a Marxist, the analysis itself is solid and that’s what matters.
Some people on the left seem to have this weird hangup where they believe that they will become morally tainted by coming into the slightest contact with something that touched a reactionary, like a germophobe not wanting to touch things other people have touched for fear of catching their diseases, but for politics.
Exactly. Good analysis comes from diverse sources, and limiting yourself to people you already agree with is a fast track to an information bubble detached from reality. There’s another benefit to exposing yourself to diverse sources as well. Engaging with ideas you disagree with forces you to test your own beliefs. When you encounter opposing views, ask yourself why you disagree. Working through that tension will expose weak points in your own thinking, and doing so sharpens your understanding going forward.
the article is written by a literal Marxist, refusing to read things because they’re printed on a particular site is the most lib behavior ever
Even if it wasn’t written by a Marxist, the analysis itself is solid and that’s what matters.
Some people on the left seem to have this weird hangup where they believe that they will become morally tainted by coming into the slightest contact with something that touched a reactionary, like a germophobe not wanting to touch things other people have touched for fear of catching their diseases, but for politics.
Exactly. Good analysis comes from diverse sources, and limiting yourself to people you already agree with is a fast track to an information bubble detached from reality. There’s another benefit to exposing yourself to diverse sources as well. Engaging with ideas you disagree with forces you to test your own beliefs. When you encounter opposing views, ask yourself why you disagree. Working through that tension will expose weak points in your own thinking, and doing so sharpens your understanding going forward.