• 9 Posts
  • 15 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: March 23rd, 2022

help-circle

  • There is a page in history when the worker first fought back When the might of exploitation at last began to crack In farm and field and factory, in workshop, mine and mill A flame was lit, a beacon bright, that flame is burning still

    Connolly was there, Connolly was there Bold, brave, undaunted, James Connolly was there

    William Martin Murphy and his Dublin millionaires Tried bribery and corruption, hypocrisy and prayers To smash the Transport Union, their scabs they did enlist But all their graft was shattered by a scarlet iron fist

    For Connolly was there, Connolly was there Bold, brave, undaunted, James Connolly was there

    When the bosses tried to sweat the lads way down in Glasgow’s Clyde A voice like rolling thunder, soon shook them in their stride In Liverpool and Belfast where the workers lived in hell James Connoly rose and gave them hope, the truth to you i’ll tell

    And Connolly was there, Connolly was there Bold, brave, undaunted, James Connolly was there

    Oh Irishmen the day will come when workers one and all Will rise up from their bended knees and rally to the call Throw out the bosses’ tyranny and shout from shore to shore For a working man’s republic and for freedom evermore

    Connolly will be there, Connolly will be there Bold, brave, undaunted, James Connolly will be there


  • [This comment is also very good:]

    China was able to maintain sovereign Party control while deploying market mechanisms within a planned framework.

    Key was crushing the 1989 Tiananmen CIA/NGO-backed color revolution attempt and removing comprador infiltrators like Zhao Ziyang. This unlike the USSR, where the Party fragmented and capitulated to foreign-backed reformers.

    The CPC then shrewdly built state-directed national champions, kept finance under Party command, and tightly controlled integration with global markets — avoiding the asset-stripping that ravaged post-Soviet Russia.

    As for the USSR’s “autocracy”, for the most part — including its errors — seems like a reactive posture shaped by postwar encirclement and the imperative to defend against relentless imperialist pressure.

    China, in contrast, leveraged its split with the USSR to gain controlled access to Western capital — a strategic move that fueled development without surrendering sovereignty.











  • It’s a possible path to de-escalation. I don’t know if India will take it but at least this way they can spin it in their own media to look less humiliating, which in turn means they aren’t forced escalate in order to not look weak. Best case scenario each side spins it as a win and things go back to the regular level of tensions.

    Honestly things would be so much easier if India was a bit more willing to compromise on issues like this. It’s not impossible. China settled their border issues in Kashmir with Pakistan way back in the 1960s in a very mutually satisfactory way. And now their border guards are taking pictures like this:

    In a better alternate universe this could be Pakistan and India…







  • Eh…it’s a start, but it’s not particularly impressive. Ethnic nationalism is a threat to the multi-ethnic Russian state, so of course someone whose primary interest is in preserving that state would adopt this view. Not to mention the fact that fighting literal Nazis for three years kind of pushes you in this direction regardless whether you wanted it or not. So it’s not that he is any less reactionary than he has always been, it’s that the circumstances in which he finds himself leave him no other choice. It would be actually based if he restored the name of Stalingrad. Sure, that would also just be symbolic, but it would be a much clearer signal that the Russian state, even if still bourgeois for the time being, is looking seriously to its anti-Nazi roots.