• geoff@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 days ago

      I’ve been all Wayland for years on Intel and AMD, never had a single problem. I’ve also been choosing those GPUs due to their high quality open source drivers, and I don’t regret it.

    • chasteinsect@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      I also had some problems with my nvidia gpu around a year ago when I switched over to linux.

      I’m not sure whether this was wayland specific, but when the GPU’s clock speed would jump up after some time of inactivity it would cause this sort of stutter / lag for that 1 second of transition. Was really annoying, I had to change the minimum clock speed, it did help. I eventually switched to a AMD gpu and everything worked perfectly without me needing to do anything.

      And in general I had a couple of more problems with some electron apps back then (Obsidian), that did not work well when forced to run wayland. Though this was probably not nvidia specific. Eventually I remember finding some sort of fix for it by setting some obscure environment variable that I found on hyprlands discord that was recently made available.

    • sip@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      right. I got an AMD and the driver is utter shit. I had to disable features using kernel cmdline bitmask flags, so that it doesn’t crash every 2 hours. wayland + amd classic.

      never had compositor or display server issues with nvidia on linux.

    • Dumhuvud@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 days ago

      The term “stable” is not meant to be used as a synonym for “reliable” when describing distros.

      • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 days ago

        Exactly. The term “stable” in connection with software has the same problems of “free”; without understanding the context, it can be interpreted wrongly. “stable” type of distributions are meant to be “unchanging” in the sense of feature freeze. That off course depends on the distro or software in general how far this goes. Archlinux is “unstable” in the sense it is ever changing and adapting new technologies by breaking compatibility; something Debian does not.

    • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 days ago

      It depends on the distribution. In example Manjaro was unstable for me, while EndeavourOS is stable for the most part. In fact, Manjaro was holding back packages and is less rolling release than EndeavourOS, and yet less stable (for me). :D

  • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 days ago

    I was a bit reluctant at first (pun intended)

    I think this is the Reluctant Anarchist guy from YouTube? His writing style would match the way he talks in the videos.