• joaomarrom [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 days ago

    The article also mentions that this is beneficial to SpaceX as it means the end of life satellites will re-enter faster

    then just this once our interests align, because that probably lowers the chance of a Kessler Syndrome scenario, which was always my main concern in relation to this satellite swarm bullshit

    • fox [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      They’re in way too low an orbit to pose a Kessler threat since any debris would fall back down on a scale of a few months to under a decade. The danger comes from stuff that’s at decade-to-century lifetimes.

      Starlink sucks for a bunch of other reasons like the huge rocket emissions to put a bunch of astronomy-polluting garbage in space that’s designed to fail.

      • barrbaric [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 days ago

        They also have massively increased the level of aluminum oxide in the atmosphere from all the satellites burning up (something like a 30% increase over baseline), which might damage the ozone layer.

        Apparently half of all active satellites are Starlink and they plan to increase the current number by ~8x.