• fox [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    They’re in way too low an orbit to pose a Kessler threat since any debris would fall back down on a scale of a few months to under a decade. The danger comes from stuff that’s at decade-to-century lifetimes.

    Starlink sucks for a bunch of other reasons like the huge rocket emissions to put a bunch of astronomy-polluting garbage in space that’s designed to fail.

    • barrbaric [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      They also have massively increased the level of aluminum oxide in the atmosphere from all the satellites burning up (something like a 30% increase over baseline), which might damage the ozone layer.

      Apparently half of all active satellites are Starlink and they plan to increase the current number by ~8x.