• purpleworm [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 month ago

    ML is an ideology/theoretical framework that is not itself relations of production and is aimed at producing a socialist relations of production, so I think it’s still a bit silly.

    • LeninWeave [none/use name, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      so I think it’s still a bit silly

      Good summary of many leftcom positions, I think. As far as I can tell, it’s mostly this kind of rigid “this is my definition of socialism, anyone who does not instantly implement it is not a socialist regardless of the material conditions they are working in” stuff.

      • FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        I would like to meet one of these people in person. I mean, I’m sure they’d be horrified at me since I’m very opposed to dogmatism, am not a Marxist, and simply believe that working and oppressed people must seek to elevate themselves via attaining political power. If there is some version of Marx out there that is more concerned with forming a utopia where no form of exploitation takes place, they can keep him! I’ll stick with reading the notes of the revolutionaries that have actually done something.