I’ve always had it that the baseline is understanding dialectical materialism. If both parties are truly materialist, then the disagreements are discussion rather than fundamentals.
The “anarchists” who are also not materialist easily show their whole ass when being asked about what the next steps for a new revolutionary government would be and how that government would defend itself against imperialists as well as how the government would implement their bureaucracy.
I’ve always had it that the baseline is understanding dialectical materialism. If both parties are truly materialist, then the disagreements are discussion rather than fundamentals.
The “anarchists” who are also not materialist easily show their whole ass when being asked about what the next steps for a new revolutionary government would be and how that government would defend itself against imperialists as well as how the government would implement their bureaucracy.