Saw a post today from a Blue MAGA type lib that was all about “don’t be mean to people that just decided to care about Gaza recently”. Libs starting to actually feel vulnerable about Dems being terrible genocide supporters for years, and they don’t want anyone to talk about it because it’s not “effective political strategy”. Same lib also posting about how authoritarian China/Xi is with heavy reference to Tinyman Square and genocide/disappearances etc.

If I had to be around a lib talking like this in person, I’d probably lose my shit.

  • purpleworm [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    18 days ago

    You seem to be demonstrating an understanding that the pertinent variable is not, in fact, if they are public figures: If they’re just ass-covering, that’s the issue. Journos, etc. are also human beings and also make mistakes (even catastrophic ones) or fall into reaction that they find their way out of. If they are sincere, we should deal with them like we should other humans and be understanding (and take advantage of their platform). If they are insincere, we should deal with them like we should other humans and take them to task.

    • iie [they/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      18 days ago

      Yeah pretty much. I just think that, at this point, two years into it, anyone whose job is to be informed and shape discourse, and is just now coming around, needs to meet a very high bar of public contrition and epiphany.

      • purpleworm [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        18 days ago

        Sure, it’s not something they can be casual about, definitely, but some people are sunk really deep into the muck and a number were basically groomed into it (this applies especially to a certain subset of Jewish people in Zio families).