reaper_cushions [he/him, comrade/them]

  • 1 Post
  • 29 Comments
Joined 5 years ago
cake
Cake day: November 7th, 2020

help-circle
  • Do you remember Thomas Dewey? Governor of New York, Republican presidential candidate in 1944 and 1948? Or Adlai Stevenson, who was the Democrats’ fall guy to tank the guaranteed losses to Eisenhower. Or most candidates that lost an election more than 50 years ago that didn’t go on to cement their role in history somehow, like Nixon, for example. Kamala won’t be remembered as a loser, she won’t be remembered at all.

    Edit: I just reread my comment, it comes off as much more aggressive than I intended it to (which is not at all). Apologies for that.







  • Not even that, transistors (at least the ones I know the foundational mechanisms of, like MOSFETs, but I am by no means an expert) can be understood perfectly well with a classical or semi-classical approach to electrodynamics. For more modern (and much less widespread and well developed) things like optical cavities or any implementation of quantum computing, QED starts playing a role, even though in my limited experience, the full blown quantum field theory approach is not needed either. QFT is fundamental physics research with little to no practical application outside of its field of research - yet. But of course, that does not invalidate the research done in the field and certainly not the mathematical foundations of it.