Kimilsungist-Kimjongilist.

  • 8 Posts
  • 21 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: March 1st, 2022

help-circle



  • Yes, that is concerning. And the way Cruz is talking sort of confirms my suspicion that Washington is in chaos right now – there’s no one person making the decisions, and Lindsey Graham (that Dixieland moron) has if anything more power to decide, unilaterally, foreign policy than has the president. Not that it would be good either way, but this seems a dangerous breakdown in basic government functioning, which could have disastrous consequences for the world.












  • I’ll copy-paste here a comment I made earlier (it’s limited to the US situation, and I don’t claim it’s the definitive analysis):

    Today you have on one side finance capital, the big oil companies like Exon Mobile, and “legacy” capitalists, all of whom sit in the highest halls of power. They are allied with the Democrats and the intelligence agencies. On the other you have low-level capitalists like Trump and Betsy DeVos, and the world of tech startups in Silicon valley. They are allied with the MAGA wing of the Republican Party, and what drives them is a kind of resentment about being controlled, regulated, and generally shut out from the upper echelons of political power. The Trumps and DeVoses of the world have obviously long been at the beck and call of upper-level capital in the US, but the tech companies are shut out as well: Silicon Valley was set up as a tech monopoly by the US government, and the newcomers on the scene have to play by rules which favor Google, Apple, and Microsoft. Trump and the tech startups are right now trying to throw off the yoke of finance capital and the oil companies. I do not expect them to succeed, and if they do it will likely destroy the petrodollar; which event, insofar as it would effectively end US global dominance, would end up destroying them as well. The good news is that a conflict within the ruling class is very often the prelude to the working class itself taking power. “All is in chaos on heaven and earth; the situation is excellent.”



  • Marxism is actually anti-colonialism; without anti-colonialism, Marxism loses its revolutionary character

    Substitute imperialism for colonialism, and I would actually agree with this statement. Imperialism is the primary contradiction in the world today. The article gets into this a little towards the end – " above socialism vs. imperialism, he places anti-colonialism vs. colonialism" – but the thought is not developed. What needs to be stated is that, while colonialism is a phenomena that has existed since the dawn of nations and governments, imperialism is a specific economic system, the main expression of capitalism in its monopoly stage. Not understanding this basic principle of Leninism leads to a lot of confusion.


  • What’s interesting is the way so many ordinary people are willing to entertain the fact that these these things happened. Fifteen years ago, it was murder getting your average Y*nkee to admit COINTELPRO was even a thing. Now the fact that the intelligence agencies probably had something to do with Martin Luther King’s death is accepted as basic common sense by a whole lot of people.

    I don’t have any real analysis of the situation: it’s just interesting.


  • It’s a symptom of the current conflict within the American ruling class – the sort of thing Marx described in The 18th Brumaire of Louis Napoleon. First you have a revolution in the forces of production: since the 1970s, the development and widespread adoption of sophisticated computer technology. This revolution leads to a prolonged economic crisis: the western world since 2008. The bourgeoisie, which normally has a certain level of class solidarity, splits into factions; each faction has its own ideas on how the economy can be restarted, but they want the other capitalists to foot the bill. If the process is pushed to its logical conclusion, one faction eventually builds a mass movement and uses it to take control of the state machinery, in order to suppress other factions and enact its own economic policy. This was the fascists in Germany; it was also Franklin Roosevelt in the US.

    Today you have on one side finance capital, the big oil companies like Exon Mobile, and “legacy” capitalists, all of whom sit in the highest halls of power. They are allied with the Democrats and the intelligence agencies. On the other you have low-level capitalists like Trump and Betsy DeVos, and the world of tech startups in Silicon valley. They are allied with the MAGA wing of the Republican Party, and what drives them is a kind of resentment about being controlled, regulated, and generally shut out from the upper echelons of political power. The Trumps and DeVoses of the world have obviously long been at the beck and call of upper-level capital in the US, but the tech companies are shut out as well: Silicon Valley was set up as a tech monopoly by the US government, and the newcomers on the scene have to play by rules which favor Google, Apple, and Microsoft. Trump and the tech startups are right now trying to throw off the yoke of finance capital and the oil companies. I do not expect them to succeed, and if they do it will likely destroy the petrodollar; which event, insofar as it would effectively end US global dominance, would end up destroying them as well. The good news is that a conflict within the ruling class is very often the prelude to the working-class itself taking power. “All is in chaos on heaven and earth; the situation is excellent.”