Palestine doesn’t have a regular army because they’re not allowed to be a regular state.

Why should that matter? At the end of the day an army is an army, whether it is commanded by an official state, the leadership of a political organisation, a terrorist organisation or by itself. And in the case of Israel-Palestine both commit planned out terrorist acts and atrocities.

This still seems like a one sided approach to moderating the issue.

While law demands the censorship of certain criticisms of Israel and Zionism, there are none in regards to Palestinians.

That doesn’t mean equal rules shouldn’t be applied to the other side.

If you cannot argue for the end of Israel, you should neither be allowed to argue for the end of Palestine. If you cannot defend the actions or existence of Hamas or Hezbollah, neither should you be allowed to defend the actions or existence of the IDF. If you call for a one state solution it should include equal rights not only for Israelis but also Palestinians.