I’m sick of having to look up what country an author is from to know which variant of teaspoon they’re using or how big their lemons are compared to mine. It’s amateur hour out there, I want those homely family recipes up to standard!

What are some good lessons from scientific documentation which should be encouraged in cooking recipes? What are some issues with recipes you’ve seen which have tripped you up?

  • doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Recipes should be written with the quantities in the procedure. So instead of reading

    Mix flour, salt and sugar in a large mixing bowl

    It should be

    Mix flour (300g), salt (1/4 tsp), and sugar (20g) in a large mixing bowl

    That way you don’t need to read/refer to ingredient list, read/refer to ingredient list, etc

  • dumples@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I was a professional chemist for around ~7 and love to cook. My suggestion is to stop expecting precision with an imprecise and natural product like cooking. Are your lemons larger? They also might be sweeter, tarter, juicer etc. than others. Same thing with teaspoons. The spices you are using may be more or less concentrated than who wrote it.

    Lean into the uncertainty and be free. Double or even triple spices to see if you like it. Measure with your heart

  • chobeat@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Cooking is not a standardized or reproducible process at home, because the variables outside of anybody’s control. Modern mass recipes give only the illusion of being reproducible algorithms, but they will never achieve that.

    Grappling with the complexity of different tooling, supply chains, seasonality and so on, all within a recipe, is a futile effort. That complexity must be handled outside the recipe.

  • ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Autist and scientist here: you’re thinking of baking. Baking is the science one, cooking is infuriating because all of those really vague and inaccurate instructions are in fact as precise and accurate as they need to be. Seasoning is done with the heart, you do have to stir or knead u ntil it “looks right”, “a handful” is the right amount to add. The only way to find the “right” amounts is to cook over and over until you instinctively know what enough looks like.

    Anyway the ingredient I really really hate is from Jamie Oliver’s “working girl’s” pasta, where he lists “2 big handfuls of really ripe tomatoes”. I HAVE CANNED TOMATOES YOURE GETTING CANNED TOMATOES JAMIE, I DONT HAVE FUCKING TIME TO GO LOOKONG FOR REALKY RIPE TOMATOES

    Also standard teaspoon is 5ml. Just use that and taste to see if it needs more.

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      This may be true for experienced cooks but beginners need more precise instructions that are not “Until it tastes good”.

      • CrackedLinuxISO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        Thinking back on being a beginner, my problem wasn’t that instructions were imprecise, but more that I didn’t interpret “to taste” as a real instruction. It means I should fucking taste my food as I go, when at the time I would just taste it at the end.

        So many bad meals can be avoided by sampling them over time and adjusting. I should know, having made too many.

        I would classify this as an example of cooking logic (my own phrase) that needs to be learned. A lot of good recipes will assume the cook understands fundamental concepts like this, but it’s not necessarily the recipe’s job to teach you. Same as how IKEA assembly instructions might seem cryptic at first, but really boil down to using 3-4 different techniques to screw wood panels together. I do think there’s a general lack of awareness that cooking has a separate logic, and this means a lot of people never teach it to others.

        • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Just like I usually dont.
          So for example, I taste the water before I boil my pasta to see how salty it is.
          Hardly undersalted the pasta so far.
          Can’t say I do it always for the other cookings ;)

      • ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Yes, and I’m explaining that a significant part of being an experienced cook is just the understanding that cooking isn’t precise. You do not need to work out what sized teaspoons the author was using, just get any of the teaspoons out of your drawer, fill it up, mix it in, and then taste to see if it seems ok. The final result will depend on factors you can’t control for - the conditions ingredients were grown in, the age of spices when they were ground, the specific cultivar you’re using - and the author doesn’t have your personal tastes, so while they can tell you the ingredients to use they can’t give you the precise amounts that you’ll enjoy. To find that out you need to make the dish repeatedly with small adjustments until you hone in on your tastes.

  • Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    15 hours ago

    This would only make sense, if all people were baking with the exact same ingredients, in the exact same environment, with the exact same equipment. You know, like in a factory.

    For households and the like, it makes sense to have a bit of variation, until you find the way that makes it perfect for you.

    • blackbrook@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      People should try to think of recipes as performance notes, not as magical formulas. “This is how I made this, this time.

  • Che Banana@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    So you’re basically telling chefs to research and write out for you all the variables?

    Baking is a science, cooking is an art.

    Every recipe handed down through generations has notes, changes, etc…that’s what makes it beautiful.

    I am lucky to have my grandmother’s cook book with 3x5 index cards hand written, with the date and whom the recipe is from…but I don’t use lard in her Ginger Bread recipe from 1932.

    There is no exact science you’re looking for, the garlic grown here won’t be the same as the garlic grown there, your experience won’t be the same as someone who has cooked for years saying ‘fuck it, throw that in there and let’s see what happens’.

    …lol, amateur hour

    • comfy@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      (to be clear, I was saying ‘amateur hour’ tongue-in-cheek ;)

      I am lucky to have my grandmother’s cook book with 3x5 index cards hand written, with the date and whom the recipe is from…but I don’t use lard in her Ginger Bread recipe from 1932.

      That’s wonderful! All I got was a disintegrating notebook of delights. I do like deciphering it but not when I’m hungry!

      • Che Banana@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I get it!

        Now to really boil your noodle I used to work with a lot of (French) chefs who when they wrote out recipes for magazines and such (pre internet) they DGAF if it was accurate or not… “if zey screw eet up, zey sink it is zere fault”

  • micnd90 [he/him,any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I don’t

    1. Crack open 11% alcohol IPA that taste like battery acid
    2. Start cooking
    3. When in doubt, pour the IPA into the meal

    Perfect meal everytime