Over the last week, Sri Lanka has been hit by their worst national natural disaster since the 2004 Boxing Day Tsunami. Over 2 million people (about 10% of the population) were affected; the death toll is currently climbing past 600; nearly a hundred thousand homes have been damaged or destroyed, transport infrastructure is heavily damaged; industry has been damaged; and farmland has been flooded. The cost of damage so far looks to be about $7 billion, which is more than the combined budget spent on healthcare and education in Sri Lanka.
While there is plenty to say meteorologically about how this yet another concerning escalation as a result of climate change (Sri Lanka does experience cyclones, but they are usually significantly weaker than this), it’s important to note that such disasters are, to at least a certain extent, able to warned about and their impacts somewhat mitigated. However, this requires both access to early detection and warning equipment, and an economy in which development is widespread - in this case, particularly in the construction of drainage systems and regulated construction, which has not generally occurred.
The IMF, on its 17th program with Sri Lanka, is doing its utmost to prevent such an economy from developing, as they instead promote reductions in public investment. On top of this, the rebuilding effort for Sri Lanka is already being planned and funded, and such donors include, of course, many Sri Lankan oligarchs, who will rebuild the damaged portions of the country yet further according to their visions, while sidelining the working class.
Perhaps neoliberalism’s decay into its eventual death occurring concurrently into the gradual intensification of climate change and renewed wars signifies the rise of the era of disaster capitalism.
Last week’s thread is here. The Imperialism Reading Group is here.
Please check out the RedAtlas!
The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.
The Zionist Entity's Genocide of Palestine
Sources on the fighting in Palestine against the temporary Zionist entity. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:
UNRWA reports on Israel’s destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.
English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.
Mirrors of Telegram channels that have been erased by Zionist censorship.
Russia-Ukraine Conflict
Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict
Sources:
Defense Politics Asia’s youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don’t want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it’s just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists’ side.
Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.
Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:
Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.
https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR’s former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR’s forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster’s telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a ‘propaganda tax’, if you don’t believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.
Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:
Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


Ok so what I’m really curious about after thinking all this over some more: what paths forward are there for expressing this yearning for socialism for the youth? From my external perspective, I see a few potential directions this all goes. Lemme know if any of these are actually possible or what I’m missing. I’ll refer to this whole phenomena as “Youth Maoism” for lack of a better term.
sidebar on Chinese socialism
This is coming from the take I’m coalescing lately about China that it is socialism in stasis, where deeply rooted democratic and socialist structures exist in contradiction with powerful oligarchic and capitalist structures throughout society, and the CPC’s careful balancing act has made moving forward very difficult without some kind of internal or external shock, especially when so much astounding technological and economic progress is at stake.
First, Youth Maoism could simply remain in the space of ideas, memes, literary criticism. In the west, political trends often sweep through the youth in almost entirely online spaces without ever coalescing in any coherent real world or organizational sense. Since they’re reflections of real material conditions, they do inevitably end up feeding into something, but that real world expression need not reflect any particular online trend, especially if there’s a significant time gap. In this case, we would eventually see some other form of anti-systemic expression emerge unless China effectively handles the economic issues through institutional methods - a strong possibility, given the PRC’s frequently demonstrated flexibility and problem solving capacity.
Second, Youth Maoism could become an actual anti-institutional political movement. As you’ve pointed out elsewhere in the thread, that’s not something Chinese people have much experience with since Reform and Opening Up. There are no lasting protest movements because of both state repression and the state’s ability to effectively address popular concerns before they bubble over into irrepressible unrest. As dialectical marxists, that second component is important - it is impossible to construct a society where suppression alone eliminates resistance. Therefore, forming that movement would be incredibly difficult, a lengthy process of trial and error to discover what methods can succeed and grow in the PRC’s particular conditions. If this remains external to the CPC, it will obviously face huge pressure and the power of the state. This is the most dangerous path forward, because it’s where imperialist forces can find a foothold to influence these movements. I don’t think the CIA has the juice to pull off anything like that in China, but it would also be naive to totally rule it out. And the long term course of something like this impossible to predict. Could there truly be a socialist revolution within China? In a way, that adheres to an orthodox ML analysis, where the socialist state eventually gives way to popular pressure and begins the process of withering away. I dunno.
Third, Youth Maoism could become a current - and potentially a powerful, influential one - within the CPC. The CPC has undergone dramatic political changes before, developing new orientations and strategies in response to new pressures, including from the masses. This would be a sort of institutional, peaceful Cultural Revolution. Vigorous mass youth engagement with the Party and its external organs could reform the organization and drive China towards a more socialist road. The party is made of its membership, and Xi has worked on building a more rigorous Marxist current in the party. This could be taking that effort and running with it. This, too, is an interpretation of that same orthodox ML analysis about popular will leading to the demise of the state and the progression to communism.
Finally, there could be a grassroots, non-oppositional expression that I predict would be expressed primarily in rural China. State and party media like to prop up rural revitalization efforts that, in their English-language presentation, focus on a few main themes I’ve identified: Grassroots democracy, entrepreneurial youth returning from the city, ecologically sound development, and cooperative rural enterprises. I have very little understanding of the depths of these on the ground, but I’ll operate on the assumption that they represent growing trends, whatever their current scale is. If that’s the case, Youth Maoism could express itself as a grassroots organizational process that adheres closely to the Party’s objectives and methods but carries out creative socialist innovation on the ground. Here I’m back on my Venezuela communes bullshit (everybody read Commune or Nothing!). In Venezuela, these same four elements (although the youth movement looks quite different) lead to the communard movement that is rapidly advancing socialist construction in the Bolivarian Republic. If the Youth Maoists look outward to other socialist projects and study their comrades in other countries (is there any Proletarian Internationalism to this trend?), they could go into the countryside, utilize state support, and build more complex and democratic collective economic structures. Interestingly, the communards in Venezuela consciously wield the collectivist trends of indigenous and Afro-Caribbean history as a potent cultural weapon in the construction of their new model. What country on earth has a stronger living memory of collective ownership, communes, and rural socialism than China? This is not, on its own, an overturning of Chinese society. It would certainly represent a new evolution of the rural-urban contradiction. Perhaps it could find expression in Chinese cities, especially longer-standing communities with well-established collective structures. This, I think, is the ideal path forward and the best possible expression of the withering away of the state.
Of course, if this Youth Maoism actually becomes a movement in any material sense, it would find expressions in all of the above and other possibilities I’ve not imagined. Any real political movement rooted in a Marxist analysis of actually existing conditions is a varied, complex process of historical change on all available fronts.