linky

text

Trump:

It should be called football. This is football, there is no question about it.

We have to come up with another name for the NFL stuff.

  • CloutAtlas [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    24 days ago

    I haven’t looked into yank football, but if it’s similar to the introduction of gloves to boxing, it’s overall detrimental.

    Boxing gloves reduces visible damage, but vastly increases CTE and straight up fatal blows. Gloves spread the surface area, but adds weight doesn’t lessen the force of the punch which rattles the the brain inside the skull.

    There were 400 fatalities in the ring in the 50 years after introduction of gloves and 0 in the 50 years before, and that’s not mentioning CTE.

    • KuroXppi [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      24 days ago

      Different types of injuries/trauma, types of impact, so I don’t think comparing boxing to gridiron is strictly apples to apples

      https://qbi.uq.edu.au/concussion/do-helmets-protect-against-concussion

      Suggests that foam padded hard helmets protect against traumstic brain injury by dispersing the energy of the impact, but are less effective in preventing concussion caused by translocation (the sudden head movement which causes internal displacement of the brain). No support to say the soft helmets have an appreciable impact in AFL against either TBI or CTE.

      That’s not to say that helmets have a net negative impact, unless the argument is that decreased FOV means you have less ability to avoid the imapct in the first plave

      • CloutAtlas [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        23 days ago

        Would it not increase the instances of translocation? You’re less likely to run at full speed at someone else if neither party were wearing armour.

        • KuroXppi [they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          23 days ago

          Yep, that’s what other commenters have replied

          https://hexbear.net/comment/6727690

          The increased risky play taken by players more than invalidates the benefits of the gear itself. I was getting hung up about the gear in a vacuum since I don’t follow codes where it’s already a settled topic

          Idk how you’d put the genie back in the bottle in gridiron though if players, coaches and audiences are used to the current high impact play, then you’d have to reel that back in before players may feel comfortable doffing the gear