The user is saying that СССР made a mistake in how they tried to intervene against the USA. My takeaway then is: СССР should have supported the Afghani people, instead of becoming a 3rd party. At least that’s how I read it.
If both of you agree and the issue is communicating your thoughts, then we can all just move forward. Trying to find different interpretations of text, instead of resolving the underlying matter at hand, is very lib coded behavior.
СССР should have supported the Afghani people, instead of becoming a 3rd party. At least that’s how I read it.
if this was all her claims entailed, there would be no need to argue and everyone would be in agreement.
But instead she pretends like subjugating a nation for opium profits is actually the same as (again, admittedly in the wrong way) trying to defend a socialist state that explicitly asked for your assistance, since the soviet army committed human rights violations (though the much higher amount of atrocities from the various reactionary forces is somehow simultaneously irrelevant)
The user is saying that СССР made a mistake in how they tried to intervene against the USA. My takeaway then is: СССР should have supported the Afghani people, instead of becoming a 3rd party. At least that’s how I read it.
If both of you agree and the issue is communicating your thoughts, then we can all just move forward. Trying to find different interpretations of text, instead of resolving the underlying matter at hand, is very lib coded behavior.
if this was all her claims entailed, there would be no need to argue and everyone would be in agreement.
But instead she pretends like subjugating a nation for opium profits is actually the same as (again, admittedly in the wrong way) trying to defend a socialist state that explicitly asked for your assistance, since the soviet army committed human rights violations (though the much higher amount of atrocities from the various reactionary forces is somehow simultaneously irrelevant)