Do not let the armies of bile-spewing neofascists on social media fool you into thinking that neofascist intellectuals are nonexistent; any movement can gain intellectuals. That being said, while Kirkegaard has at least some of the form nailed down, he is too clumsy to manipulate anybody who is not already inclined to agree with his politics.
For starters, Kirkegaard does not build up to his conclusions by seducing his audience with a series of facile truths, like a more competent manipulator would. Instead, he trusts his audience to already agree with the dubious conclusion that intelligence is measurable rather than a matter of opinion. Simultaneously, he trusts his audience to take evolutionary psychology without a grain of salt.
Kirkegaard also makes the amateur mistake of letting his mask of professionalism slip by injecting his research with subjective language or, in other articles, taking potshots at somebody. Although it is less prominent in this particular entry, I think that we can still see something that clearly does not belong here:
This suggests some kind of confounding factor, e.g. Asians living in more removed or sexually liberated places (choose your own description!).
Of course, the elephant in the room here is the author’s laughworthy assumption that preference for certain body parts is in any way correlated to intelligence. What is to stop somebody with (say) a doctorate from preferring buttocks over breasts? The answer is nothing. Contrary to what evolutionary psychologists believe, there are plenty of ordinary men (including White men) who are otherwise attracted to women yet simply do not find breasts sexually arousing, as Clellan S. Ford and Frank A. Beach documented in Patterns of Sexual Behavior.
However, the crux of Kirkegaard’s tosh is not merely that favouring breasts over buttocks likely means that you are ‘more intelligent’, but that your race is ‘more intelligent’. Yes, White supremacists, not being satisfied with disparaging other ethnicities as ‘unintelligent’, also feel the bizarre need to disparage their sexual preferences. I can only assume that neofascists see something ‘homosexual’ and therefore ‘weak’ or ‘feminine’ about favoring buttocks over breasts, because otherwise I am unsure what they hope to accomplish here. I have no doubt that they feel entitled to police others’ sexual preferences, but that does not explain why they would devote any attention to this.
i must be a massive fuckin idiot then
if ur an AuDHD gal with a dumptruck ass holla at ya boi
These men would unironically benefit from letting their dicks do their thinking for them. There is no way their dicks could come up with anything as stupid as this.
what about those who like personality

That makes u a ligma male
What’s ligma like a new greek letter?
It’s the guy who made Mac computers.
the girl reading this
It’s sort of like when your favorite D&D Monster Manual entry is the Mind Goblin

I can only assume that neofascists see something ‘homosexual’ and therefore ‘weak’ or ‘feminine’ about favoring buttocks over breasts
It could also be racist. There is the whole stereotype of black guys loving big asses.
That is what he claims:
Using international and subnational comparisons across English and Spanish and two different sources of search interest, we find that Africans are more interested in butts and more intelligent people are more interested in breasts.
Assuming that this is correct, what is wrong with this preference? Surely Kirkegaard is not so simple as to believe that Black humans approving of something makes it wrong.
I don’t know what he actually thinks and I don’t care enough to guess. Maybe he’s sincere in his beliefs, or maybe he’s doing it just to be racist. Or maybe he needs to prove to himself that his love for titties is not only valid but virtuous and a sign of high intelligence. I don’t know, and I don’t care enough to delve into the inner workings of a white supremacist’s mind.
But I do still wonder why he’s got to be so weird about it. If someone made a fake study to prove that their kink for fur suits, pegging, or rimming was actually a sign of high intelligence, they’d probably get ruthlessly mocked online.
If someone made a fake study to prove that their kink for fur suits, pegging, or rimming was actually a sign of high intelligence,
brb, it’s time to do some science, baybee
I was almost wondering why a 1800s philosopher had a paper about sexual preferences but no, it’s someone else that has the surname ‘Kirkegaard’ being a white supremacist…
what if you’re a woman and like boobs?
It means you need to partner up with another woman who likes boobs to trigger an infinite intelligence glitch. The more you feed into each others’ love of boobs, the more intelligent you both become.
ultimate sigma maneuver: being into butt and boob
Probably doesn’t need to be mentioned, but it wasn’t published by a legitimate journal.
Edit: It was explained further in one of the links that OP posted that the journal was actually started by the writer’s own foundation, which makes things look so much worse. Imagine being such a charlatan that there needs to be a conflict of interest for your pseudoscience to get published in a fake journal.
Woke moralist.
That being said, while Kirkegaard has at least some of the form nailed down, he is too clumsy to manipulate anybody who is not already inclined to agree with his politics.

As The Only True Leftist in the western world, I provide equal attention to both.
yeah i’m a centrist, the left and right cheeks both make good points
Ok I really gotta read 1800 german philosophy
What Kirkegaard failed to consider was how everyone has a butt.
Yes, his entire theory sounds very anti-male to me.













