mf talking about “dismantling white supremacy” while glorifying an imperialist war machine that brutalized, tortured, and massacred foreign civilians. Fuck these people jfc

  • Goblinmancer [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Trump outright disrespect for the military is the only cool thing about him. Most dictator/leaders just kiss their military asses and hes just there saying anyone who enlists is a loser lol.

    Even cooler/lamer is the us military will never do a coup regardless of how humiliated/underpaid they are.

    • How deep is this disrespect? On the one hand he’s like “they’re all woke !!! soy army !!!” but then he’s handing them more money than ever and letting them live out their Iran war fantasies.

      I’m not American and don’t really follow the UsPol beyond this thread so I don’t know how much of the disrespect is just kayfabe.

      • TreadOnMe [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        It’s the military contractors that are getting the money more that the actual military. That said, the U.S. military itself is primarily made up of the worst kinds of dullards and sociopaths. The smart ones, the real psychos, use it to transition to the private sector as soon as they can.

  • The only good veterans:

    1. revolutionaries that channelled their disillusionment of their role in imperialism into dismantling the empire entirely.
    2. in military prison for fragging their CO.
    3. dead.

    Any of this “defending our constitution” shit is just the line they expect their old officers to use to lead a coup against Drumpf to restore Obama-era social fascism.

        • fannin [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          3 days ago

          I don’t even talk about it because it’s not important now, but for me I was weaned off GWB conservative jingoism well before I commissioned but it seemed like a good career that my family had done for two generations. When I realized how much harm I was actually doing I resigned as soon as possible and spent a long time in a very dark mental place. The thing that opened my eyes was the “peacenik” Obama blowing up three hospitals in four weeks and I think I deserved all the mental anguish because brown people being fellow human beings is something I think I should have just known without having to learn it, and also it was not nearly as bad as what we were inflicting daily.

  • BelieveRevolt [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    lol, I’m assuming you saw the thread a while ago about the veteran on Lemmy saying they were proud of their service and had the nerve to say they weren’t any more complicit in American wars than any other citizen.

  • VILenin [he/him]@hexbear.netM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    War criminal that could not attend. I have a very long story of holding onto my core imperialist and chauvinist beliefs. You can tell by the fact that I’m still an unrepentant war criminal who continues to keep their oath to brutalize the enemies of empire.

    A lot of my fellow war criminals (men I looked up to) believed in brutalizing actual human beings instead of keeping it to the dirty brown untermenschen, and I will not stand for that.

    I know that America is a genocidal empire but I still believe in the lies they made up to justify it. I’m despondent over the fact that the lies don’t actually hold water. I want to go back to a time when the genocidal empire used more polite and sophisticated words when they justified war crimes.

    Prior to America, nobody had really thought of killing millions of people and stealing their land to construct a prison of never-ending misery. A revolutionary concept. I will continue to fight for the genocidal ideals on which this country was founded.

    The first step to achieving that dream is giving us a bigger slice of the imperialist pie. The second step is to allow people of all backgrounds to participate in the imperialist death machine. Though I think the second step is the key.

  • purpleworm [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    3 days ago

    I think it’s really interesting that this person is talking both about their “oath to defend the constitution” as a serious moral value and also abolishing capitalism. I’ve never seen that before that I can remember.

    Hellworld: Liberalism survives by persuading the population that capitalism has been abolished and replaced with socialism (you know, like Norway) while the US government remains completely intact

    • Wheaties [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      3 days ago

      If anything is gonna change, fundamentally change and for the better, in US politics, I suspect it’ll be along those lines.

      Yes, it is a contradiction to “uphold the constitution” and call for an end to capitalism - the very economic system that constitution caters to. But… americans are real good at not noticing contradictions. Most of us couldn’t say what’s actually in the constitution beyond “We the people”, “Right to freedom of speech”, and “Right to bare arms” [1]. If at some point we renegotiate the framework we live under, those quotes aren’t the worst starting position, at least.


      1. Note that between the first quote and the next two quotes is a gap that includes the whole fucking document ↩︎

      • purpleworm [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        3 days ago

        My point with the reference to Norway is that we wouldn’t have socialism, we’d just call it that while still having capitalism.

        I don’t think we should be planning around living in the eternal shadow of the Constitution. It’s like one of those things baby leftists say where “What if we all promote socialism under a different name? They’ll never know!” It’s silly, gives reactionaries way too much ceded ground, and fails to distinguish us from liberals for the sake of avoiding needing to actually engage with people’s attitudes in favor of “tricking” them. It’s like some abominable chimera of Blanquism and tailism.

        If your movement does not have the strength to throw away the visage of the existing state and the need to pander to reactionaries, it does not have the strength to successfully run a socialist state, so it should work on that instead of getting ahead of itself.

        • Wheaties [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          We don’t have a movement to begin with. I agree that attempting to trick people into socialism is a very silly idea. At the same time, if we want to build a movement, it starts by meeting people where they are at rather than where we would like them to be.

          Americans are steeped in a civic mythology. It’s reinforced through our education, our media, our churches - pretty much all our institutions, both public and private. It’s gonna take a lot to overcome that. I think its possible to use the better parts of that mythology to aid in communicating a leftist perspective and to expose where that mythology is an egregious lie, and to do so without pandering to reactionaries. There’s a lot to work against and very little leverage. Why deny ourselves the rhetorical tool?

          • purpleworm [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            “We the people” has always been an egregious lie, the faux-universalism of bourgeois revolutionaries.

            Do you believe that it’s such a great thing to flatter someone’s fondness of slavers, however “selectively”? Do you believe that, when the basis of your rhetoric, the “point of leverage” to extend you analogy, is the personality cult built around slavers and that is the place from which it draws this affection that you want to “take advantage of,” that you are not either undermine socialism by joining them in veneration (but jumping in and out of their Bible recitation like a dolphin, based on which parts you think are useful), or else that you are undermining yourself by successfully attacking the cult but leaving yourself holding dead, rotten words, because you disabused them of their affection for it?

            You need to fight without taking shortcuts that you will suffer for in the future. You cannot simply take into hand the ready-made ideology of the state you are trying to destroy and act like this sort of pandering to myths is needed or even helpful. Do you know how to use the Founders to establish that class antagonism is irreconcilable and the job of a capitalist state is fundamentally to “mediate” it in favor of the capitalists? Or how democracy thereby inevitably results in undermining the power of the rich and their monopolistic claims to property, and that this is why our government is structured how it is? The Founders wrote about this. They wrote about most of it pretty explicitly, even, but they merely said that suppressing democracy was good if it meant defending the interests of the rich.

            I apologize for doing the Sturgeon thing, but if you were trying to rehabilitate a Neo-Nazi, do you think a good approach would be to quote Hitler on the basis that they would be more sympathetic to your message if he saw the famously-credible Hitler supporting parts of it? Do you think that’s how you would do best to persuade them of, I don’t know, the badness of animal cruelty or environmental degradation? Or by using some phrase that sounds good in isolation, but which he never meant and acted against [like “We the people” for the Founders]? Of courses not, because their Hitlerism is precisely the problem that you are trying to combat. So it is with members of, say, Jefferson’s cult of personality, that you aren’t going to have the best time drawing them out of the cult by using the persistence of their affection for Jefferson as a vital axiom of your appeal! It’s paradoxical.

            We have plenty of rhetorical tools already that are infinitely more valuable and don’t do favors for the heart of the ideology we want to destroy, most of all that the truth is on our side, and therefore the empirical record is on our side, and we shouldn’t undermine this with disingenuous, condescending pablum as though we don’t believe they can accomplish in their development what we already have and didn’t need such backward tools for, because if those tools were used on us we’d be just as likely to become “Patriotic Communists” or whatever the ACP calls itself. Despite the memes, we also have human nature on our side, because humans are inclined toward empathy and toward helping each other, such that it needs to be beaten down with cruelty by the system we live in, but they are incapable of taking it from us. Most of all, though, our greatest persuasive tool is that we can actually help people where others refuse to, even if it’s just a tiny mutual aid network, or treating someone like a human deserving of dignity when others won’t, but it can also be greater, like helping them organize a union in a shitty job they’ve been stuck in for 20 years so they can see how collective action can help all workers, themselves included, or toppling some dogshit centrist mayor who does nothing but sell out his constituents and yet gets re-elected because it’s a blue state and the red guy is worse and the DNC is firmly on his side.

            Any sensible person would be able to tell that when you said “We the people,” you were speaking out of both sides of your mouth, and even a less-sensible person may grow wise to it eventually, and thereby quite reasonably resent your disingenuousness all the more for having been successfully baited by it in the past.

            It’s not like I’ve never quoted the Founders to explain something. I think it’s a pretty good summary of the attitude of revolutionary socialists that

            I must study Politicks and War that my sons may have liberty to study Mathematicks and Philosophy. My sons ought to study Mathematicks and Philosophy, Geography, natural History, Naval Architecture, navigation, Commerce and Agriculture, in order to give their Children a right to study Painting, Poetry, Musick, Architecture, Statuary, Tapestry and Porcelaine.

            Which was, of course, written by John Adams. I even have something of a feeling of emotional resonance with the broader context of the message, which is that he is saying that he wishes that he could be in the position of his grandson and study art instead of war. In explaining my own disposition to people, I tend to say that I have a lot of the disposition of a conservative, I just don’t live in a society that should be conserved and therefore wish that one could be established where being a conservative would be a good thing, because it was a just society that should be conserved. However, in saying this, I’m using a common point of reference, but would never, ever raise the issue to someone without pointing out that Adams’s message is farcical in relation to what he actually did if he meant anything other than literally his own son and grandson, and that when I say it is a good summary, that’s by taking it as speaking of the future generations of all people, regardless of ethnicity, gender, etc., which Adams demonstrably was not very interested in and surely did not mean.

  • infuziSporg [e/em/eir]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 days ago

    Americans are the most propagandized people on Earth. American civil religion runs extremely deep, and the military is largely several more layers of this, combined with a sense of purpose and connection in this atomized civilization.

    It takes a whole lot of deprogramming to get someone to even consider that the armed forces are merely the enforcers for billionaires and their criminal aspirations. Say this outright too early and your effort will fall flat on its face.

    It’s amusing to note that it’s easier for veterans to imagine the end of capitalism than to abandon loyalty to the military.

    • Krem [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      3 days ago

      is that a guy with a AFA flag pfp talking about how he loves the US constitution and how awesome the US killing machine is because of comraderie and oaths

      • VILenin [he/him]@hexbear.netM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        3 days ago

        A redditor who, by their own admission, pledged an oath of loyalty to the most murderous capitalistic empire on the planet, and continues to uphold said oath, thinks they’re a radical because they paid lip service to “abolishing capitalism”, whatever the fuck they think that means

      • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        how awesome the US killing machine is because of comraderie and oaths

        That’s literally how Horus Heresy series portrays World Eaters, most genocidal marine legion. And they had brain cybernetics causing them pain when they weren’t killing (which they installed willingly).

  • LeninWeave [none/use name, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    American troops that don’t feel shame, but instead feel pride for what they’ve participated in, are worth less than nothing to any movement. They are fascists, whether they admit it or not, and should be considered potentially dangerous to those around them. They don’t even consider the humanity of people outside of the first world, that attitude can quickly be turned onto their own communities in the wrong circumstances.

      • LeninWeave [none/use name, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        American imperial “leftists” be like: “It’s wrong that the capitalist system steals from us the value of the labor we rightfully stole from our genetic inferiors at home and abroad!”

      • WokePalpatine [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        3 days ago

        Them and cops refuse to admit any wrongdoing. That their ideology or moral system were wrong. That jobs created by these system might not be needed. That they fucked up personally in anyway. The most radical you’ll get are reformists who are mostly mad that these jobs/systems sometimes harm the people they hire and that’s about it. It’s really pathetic. Almost every other job people will be willing to denigrate, critique, quit, admit suck ass, etc. Maybe the people who aren’t morally-slow already know not to take these jobs in the first place.

    • Parzivus [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s funny cause all the military guys I know, whether they regret it or not, only joined for the benefits. Doesn’t make it defensible per say, but the idea that some people are actually patriotic about it is bizarre.

  • Krem [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    it would be cool as hell if there were People’s Army and National Liberation Front veterans there though, veterans of the americans’ war against the vietnamese. would also be cool if some baathist army veterans attended but i guess that’s more difficult.

    i’m sure the epic redditors would “thank them for their service” right