Or do they just like Michael Richards?

Same with the poster of Jason Alexander striking a sexy pose, I don’t get that one either.

I used to see this poster in dorm rooms when I was in college, now I see it in garages.

  • dragongloss [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s just two iconic moments from the show, one was a when Kramer did some amateur photography for George and they got carried away. The other was when an old couple loved an oil painting of Kramer and wanted to hang it up in their house but for different reasons. The husband found it offensive and disturbing and the wife found it charming and delightful.

    Also fuck Seinfeld.

  • HiImThomasPynchon [des/pair, it/its]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 months ago

    You’re underestimating how big not only Seinfeld, but specifically Kramer was in the day. When Seinfeld ended, the wise money was on Michael Richards having the most successful career afterward. Unfortunately, his spinoff show failed and his set at the Laugh Factory is probably the reason you see it in garages now.

    As for the appeal of both posters: Juxtaposition. The poster in the pic is a classy, dignified portrait of a man who once installed a garbage disposal in his shower so he could cook while he bathes (among other bizarre escapades). The one of George Costanza is a deeply unsexy man attempting to be titillating. The other aspect of the George Costanza poster is that you don’t really need to understand anything about the character in order to understand what’s funny about the poster. Meanwhile, somebody who’s never seen Seinfeld wouldn’t understand the appeal of the Kramer portrait.