• ComradeRandy@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    “I believe we need to recognize the material conditions are so deeply against us that in order for a revolution to have any chance of success in this jingoist country we will almost certainly need to make active inroads in splitting the military ideologically and pushing them left utilizing their experience in combat to serve as cadres. I wont disagree that veterans are overwhelmingly reactionary, I’m not even saying I like them, however I cannot think of a single revolution that succeeded without an organized effort deployed to incorporate military experience into the revolution itself. Without that I can’t imagine a revolution progressing further than the Paris Commune.” You aren’t conducting any historical or material analysis, youre basing your entire successful revolution on whether or not your allies pass a vibe check, this dogmatic insistence is why I believe you to be a leftcom.

    • Darkcommie@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      “No historically or materially analysis” sure dude good luck trying to split the military ideologically and I’m the idealist here whats next we should split the police ideologically

      • ComradeRandy@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 minutes ago

        I am not trying to attack you but rather engage in dialectics as every good communist must do. I highly recommend you reading this book, it will help you understand what it means to be a marxist leninist. Without a grasp of dialectical materialism and historical materialism I’m afraid there are going to be a great deal of definitions you are using very differently from the average marxist leninist as evident by your misunderstanding of idealism