As I said in thread from the goaded user, there are so many things wrong with this, but let’s just say for the sake of argument that Stalin was a red fascist who was gay for Hitler and wanted to be his best friend and also wanted to help perpetrate the Holocaust and add as many things as you like and say it’s true of the entire Politburo too, it was all just Wehraboos top to bottom:
Stalin wasn’t killed in WWII, it was normal citizens of the USSR who were killed by the millions. What the fuck do you mean “the Soviets” weren’t the victims of WWII? Those civilians, those millions upon millions of people unambiguously subjected to a racial-supremacist genocide, are also Soviets! And so were the Red Army soldiers who were summarily executed after they were captured or, you know, were conscripted regardless in most cases, and again were killed by the millions.
Want to say Stalin’s son had it coming? Go ahead, I don’t give a shit. Want to say Stalin had every bad thing that ever happened to him coming? Whatever. But saying “The Soviets” weren’t victims is absolutely minimizing the moral outrage of the Nazi-led genocide and that user should be regarded as having done a Horseshit Theory all the way around to agreeing with fascists that some ethnically-Polish dirt farmers and their fucking children had it coming when the OUN-B slaughtered them.
It’s so disgusting that the historical revisionist attitude regarding the M-R treaty doesn’t even register anymore. Like, normal American liberals don’t say this sort of thing, even they would be appalled by it, and when the American liberals are standing up for the Soviets relative to you, you’ve really fucked up being an “anarchist” and let your personal resentment of “tankies” just completely consume you as a person, at least on a moral and political-theoretical level.
As I said in thread from the goaded user, there are so many things wrong with this, but let’s just say for the sake of argument that Stalin was a red fascist who was gay for Hitler and wanted to be his best friend and also wanted to help perpetrate the Holocaust and add as many things as you like and say it’s true of the entire Politburo too, it was all just Wehraboos top to bottom:
Stalin wasn’t killed in WWII, it was normal citizens of the USSR who were killed by the millions. What the fuck do you mean “the Soviets” weren’t the victims of WWII? Those civilians, those millions upon millions of people unambiguously subjected to a racial-supremacist genocide, are also Soviets! And so were the Red Army soldiers who were summarily executed after they were captured or, you know, were conscripted regardless in most cases, and again were killed by the millions.
Want to say Stalin’s son had it coming? Go ahead, I don’t give a shit. Want to say Stalin had every bad thing that ever happened to him coming? Whatever. But saying “The Soviets” weren’t victims is absolutely minimizing the moral outrage of the Nazi-led genocide and that user should be regarded as having done a Horseshit Theory all the way around to agreeing with fascists that some ethnically-Polish dirt farmers and their fucking children had it coming when the OUN-B slaughtered them.
It’s so disgusting that the historical revisionist attitude regarding the M-R treaty doesn’t even register anymore. Like, normal American liberals don’t say this sort of thing, even they would be appalled by it, and when the American liberals are standing up for the Soviets relative to you, you’ve really fucked up being an “anarchist” and let your personal resentment of “tankies” just completely consume you as a person, at least on a moral and political-theoretical level.
Edit: @unruffled@anarchist.nexus I forget if tags work on edits