A better question is , why are people on hexbear doing the whole lib thing with sources? Like you don’t have to agree with it, you can read it critically. Just cause something is written in Atlantic doesn’t mean there isn’t interesting information there.
In defense of the people complaining, this article is staggeringly wrong. I can’t imagine a way to draw a more incorrect and useless conclusion from the data without literally veering into right wing conspiracy theory flat-earth-tier stuff. The author is literally doing “no, it wasn’t gutting and privatizing education, it was kids who only know charge their phone and teacher’s unions bad”.
A better question is , why are people on hexbear doing the whole lib thing with sources? Like you don’t have to agree with it, you can read it critically. Just cause something is written in Atlantic doesn’t mean there isn’t interesting information there.
WE’RE AMERICANS! WE DON’T READ SO GOOD
deleted by creator
In defense of the people complaining, this article is staggeringly wrong. I can’t imagine a way to draw a more incorrect and useless conclusion from the data without literally veering into right wing conspiracy theory flat-earth-tier stuff. The author is literally doing “no, it wasn’t gutting and privatizing education, it was kids who only know charge their phone and teacher’s unions bad”.
I mean it’s the Atlantic so don’t know why anybody would expect them to have good analysis, the numbers themselves are interesting however.
Sure, but for the news comm it might have been better to find a better source covering the same thing.
I don’t mind, personally, I had fun hate-reading it.
It was the one I ran across, no doubt there are better ones. And yeah, I personally find the absurdity of lib takes kinds of hilarious.
some people haven’t read “masses, elites, and rebels” smh