• invalidusernamelol [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      It would also be nice if ESRI/ArcGIS could be replaced with a better open format for government stuff. I know the reason is because ESRI cuts sweet deals with governments and has the “unified system” approach that’s lacking from the GDAL wild west, but it’s a pain having to constantly translate between proprietary and open formats.

      At least ESRI has basically stolen GDAL code meaning that they have a lot of functionality overlap, but the proprietary formats are hard to audit and always have some weird caveat that makes them incompatible with open formats without a bunch of wrangling.

      Basically, made the GDB and SHP formats open standards and if you’re gonna push Arcade as an interface layer for geodata, at least publish the language spec instead of just randomly changing major language features with the only release note being “bugfixes”. Get fucked Jack Dangermond.

      • starting maybe 9 ish years ago, i began i using QGIS for everything. i stopped advocating with employers to get me an ESRI license and i let all my student/researcher licenses expire.

        the only time ive run into roadblocks are with public institutions that are ESRI-knowledge only and the staff that weirdly, proudly declare their ignorance of QGIS and warn me any software issues I have won’t be supported… as though their support for that shitpile is worth 5% of what they hoover up in licensing fees.

        the process of learning QGIS and how stable/intuitive it is compared to ESRI’s subscription kludge was what truly started me on my FOSS joirney.

        • invalidusernamelol [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          The only think keeping us on it right now is the fact that it’s got a nicer drafting program draped over top. Which is what we use it for.

          The software is such a pile of garbage now, anytime you actually want to use it hidden behind 15 menus, the license model just randomly changes every quarter, they keep adding new features and not fixing literally critical regressions (you can’t split at a vertex when the map reference differs from the feature reference in 3.4-3.6 because they messed up something in the new data model. This has taken a backseat to adding an AI agent to the tool search bar).

          I use primarily arcpy in my work to interact with the design database and source data, but to get that into a usable state required me writing 3 wrapper libraries and becoming the #1 question answerer on their developer forums because apparently it’s just trash and no one cares. I’ll make recommendations with sample code and find out that they just straight up copy pasted my example into the codebase the following quarter.

          I have loved my interactions with shapely and gdal systems though. Planning on modifying my libraries to use them as a fallback so I can try and have a unified interface for both systems.

  • hello_hello [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Good change on the digital sovereignty front but it is a missed opportunity to not use a published document format like Open Document Text and co. it’s better to use those than to create another proprietary format.

    Not impressive (https://www.wps.com/download/)

    It’s packaged in NixOS but only for x86_64-linux :(

    • invalidusernamelol [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      2 days ago

      I can understand not choosing ODT since they can be opened by Windows now. If the message was to make it so they needed to use non-Microsoft software using this makes sense.

      But yeah, still prefer a GPL licensed format

      • hello_hello [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        The interoperability is good, but I’d much rather Chinese firms fund the work of the Document Foundation and derive their products from that rather than create their own in-house M$ office clones.

        Collectively owned software is going to be incredibly important for the rest of the Global South who don’t have ginormous IT industries who can rebuild everything from scratch.

        • Absolutely agree. this is one of those examples where China’s interests in nation building and “multipolarism” are at odds with internationalism (at least in the short term).

          It doesn’t really help the case that open source software can be co-opted by bourgeois interests just like any other form. If we look at Linux, for example, we see cases whereby the US state has overt influence over its development. Linus Torvalds gleefully mocked the labour of countless contributors whom he barred from developing the kernel due to their Russian nationality.

          The openness of open software is truly It’s greater strength but no permissive or restrictive licence will ever be able to thoroughly reject influence from the bourgeois state. Neither does private software, for that matter, though I guess that just means there’s no push or pull either way.

          • hello_hello [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            That is true, it’s because with collectively owned software, the power is put into the hands of the workers who create the program rather than to the “owners” of said program.

            It just happens (not by coincidence) that computer programming is heavily euro-centric and the IT industry is flourished under capitalism which leads to capitalists doing this

            The term “open source” itself was coined by techbros who wanted to explicitly de-politicize the free software movement and make it into a hobby space for privileged people rather than an ethical mode of production.

            The main issue facing workers who create non-privatized software is funding and the Global South should look to providing that funding to collective infrastructure to actually make technological reforms rather than realizing that they don’t have the labor capacity and timeline and then doing nothing because of it.

          • mistermodal@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            You’re making use the zero-sum RAND/Mearsheimer definition of multipolarity here, not the Chinese definition.

  • AernaLingus [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    2 days ago
    Full text

    China’s expansion of its rare earth export controls appeared to mark another escalation in the US-China trade war last week. But the announcements were also significant in another way: unusually, the documents could not be opened using American word processing software.

    For the first time, China’s Ministry of Commerce issued a slew of documents that could be directly accessed only through WPS Office – China’s answer to Microsoft Office – as Beijing continues its tech self-reliance drive.

    Developed by the Beijing-based software company Kingsoft, WPS Office uses a different coding structure to Microsoft Office, meaning WPS text files cannot be opened directly in Word without conversion.

    Previously, the ministry primarily released text documents in Microsoft Word format.

    The switch in document delivery format came amid escalating trade tensions between China and the US, as Washington continues to wield its technological edge as leverage in its rivalry with Beijing.

    Following China’s announcement of the new export controls, US President Donald Trump threatened that America would curb the export of “any and all critical software”.

    In recent years, Beijing has intensified its push to reduce its reliance on foreign information technology, especially software and systems used across government institutions, state-owned enterprises, universities and key strategic industries.

    The move helped China emerge almost unscathed from an outage of Microsoft’s Windows operating system in July 2024 caused by a faulty update provided by Texas-based cybersecurity company CrowdStrike, with a host of critical service providers – from airlines to banks – having already reduced their use of foreign systems.

    China’s State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission announced in 2022 that state-owned enterprises were required to achieve full adoption of domestic software across their operational systems and daily office functions by 2027.

    WPS Office is currently China’s leading domestic word processing software, while a host of domestic tech giants including NetEase, Tencent, Huawei Technologies and Alibaba Group Holding compete to provide email systems and cloud services.

    Alibaba is the owner of the South China Morning Post.

    Several foreign software providers whose systems were widely used in China in the past – including Adobe and Citrix owner Cloud Software – have either exited the Chinese market or scaled back their operations in the country in recent years.

    Earlier this year, Microsoft closed its artificial intelligence research facility in Shanghai, after shuttering all its bricks-and-mortar stores on the mainland in 2024.

    The stock price of Kingsoft Corporation, the holding company of WPS developer Kingsoft Office, had surged by as much as 18.9 per cent in Hong Kong as of Monday morning. Kingsoft Office stocks were also up 18 per cent on mainland exchanges.

  • sudoer777@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 days ago

    Why were they using Word format to begin with though? I send everything using PDF because proprietary formats suck

    • Chana [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 days ago

      PDF is the worst format in terms of support and compliance and accessibility but people like it because it feels immutable and like it will render the same everywhere (even though it often does it).

      It would be neat if we could have a format that does the good things of PDF without the bad. SVG is close.

      • invalidusernamelol [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s open at least, but so is doc. The only non-open ones I can think of are those weird encrypted epubs that require a license though.

        Turns out people don’t want to use your format if only your tools can open it.