Part of me feels the fact that EVERYONE is saying that there’s a huge AI bubble makes me wonder if there’s actually a possibility there isn’t an AI bubble. Because I was around for the dot com and GFC bubbles and no one (not really) saw those coming. Also, China is pretty much doing everything right these days, and they seem to believe in AI too.
And I’m not against AI in any and all forms. Like, I think there’s huge potential in translating foreign languages. I think it would be cool if people could talk in their native languages but have AI translate things perfectly - which I understand is something AI can do. There are some simple functions in my job (like searching through and summarizing things from our very massive list of policies). But even thinking about the absolute best case scenarios for AI, I can see how the current expectations are even close to what the reality can be.
So what is the argument that we’re not in a bubble, even if we don’t actually believe it?
I wouldn’t say the subprime crisis was backed by nothing, as it was ultimately backed by housing construction. The thing is it didn’t actually result in housing oversupply for a number of construction industry focused reasons.
Similarly, I don’t think the data center construction boom will result in as much useful infrustructure as people think. and certainly the software side is pretty useless for the intel gathering tasks they want it to have.