Because the point is to subject infants to a tremendous amount of pain at a key point in cognitive and emotional development to increase the number of sociopaths in society.
- a conspiracy theory I have no evidence or scientific basis for
Circumcision Causes Significant Psychological Harm in Children and Adolescents
Circumcision in childhood and adolescence has significant negative psychological consequences. Following a traumatic event, many children experience anxiety, depression, and anger; and many others try to avoid and suppress these painful feelings (Gil, 2006). In addition, children often experience a debilitating loss of control that negatively affects their ability to regulate emotions and make sense of the traumatic experience (Van der Kolk, 2005). In a study of adults circumcised in childhood, Hammond (1999) found that many men conceptualized their circumcision experience as an act of violence, mutilation, or sexual assault. Kennedy (1986) detailed the psychological effects of circumcision in a case study describing the psychotherapy of a boy who was circumcised at three years of age. The sense of inadequacy, feelings of victimization, and violent sexual fantasies experienced during this boy’s adolescence were found to be both consciously and unconsciously linked to his experience with losing part of his penis (Kennedy, 1986). In a study examining the psychological effects of circumcision on boys between four and seven years of age, Cansever (1965) used psychological testing to measure boys’ level of distress. The results of the study indicated that circumcision was perceived as an aggressive attack on the body that left children feeling damaged and mutilated (Cansever, 1968). Cansever (1968) also noted that these boys experienced changes in body image (with many feeling smaller and incomplete), feelings of inadequacy and helplessness, as well as a tendency to withdraw psychologically.[1]
Why don’t they just genetically modify babies so they don’t develop a foreskin to begin with, this is 2025 why has science not caught up
Just leave the foreskin alone, circumcision is medically unnecessary.
I’m just sayin’ if the foreskin is so unnecessary for some people why haven’t they snipped the problem at the root- its DNA
there must be foreskins for the foreskin god.
Is the foreskin god the one that wants the circumcisions or is it his enemy
old testament vs new testament
'cause then how would you pay homage to the prepuce-obsessed deity that you worship?
Wouldn’t genetically writing the foreskin from existence count as infinite circumcisions though
Or would it count as thwarting infinite circumcisions?
Because the point is to subject infants to a tremendous amount of pain at a key point in cognitive and emotional development to increase the number of sociopaths in society.
- a conspiracy theory I have no evidence or scientific basis for
Circumcision Causes Significant Psychological Harm in Children and Adolescents
Circumcision in childhood and adolescence has significant negative psychological consequences. Following a traumatic event, many children experience anxiety, depression, and anger; and many others try to avoid and suppress these painful feelings (Gil, 2006). In addition, children often experience a debilitating loss of control that negatively affects their ability to regulate emotions and make sense of the traumatic experience (Van der Kolk, 2005). In a study of adults circumcised in childhood, Hammond (1999) found that many men conceptualized their circumcision experience as an act of violence, mutilation, or sexual assault. Kennedy (1986) detailed the psychological effects of circumcision in a case study describing the psychotherapy of a boy who was circumcised at three years of age. The sense of inadequacy, feelings of victimization, and violent sexual fantasies experienced during this boy’s adolescence were found to be both consciously and unconsciously linked to his experience with losing part of his penis (Kennedy, 1986). In a study examining the psychological effects of circumcision on boys between four and seven years of age, Cansever (1965) used psychological testing to measure boys’ level of distress. The results of the study indicated that circumcision was perceived as an aggressive attack on the body that left children feeling damaged and mutilated (Cansever, 1968). Cansever (1968) also noted that these boys experienced changes in body image (with many feeling smaller and incomplete), feelings of inadequacy and helplessness, as well as a tendency to withdraw psychologically.[1]
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/moral-landscapes/201501/circumcisions-psychological-damage ↩︎