Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/TrueUnpopularOpinion/comments/1j6yr0l/the_great_replacement_theory_isnt_a_theory_its/

I was looking for images online to create an agitprop meme till I somehow stumbled upon this depravity.

“apolitical” Libs really think that they can put up a “NOT POLITICAL” force-field and expect “apolitical” responses in “apolitical” discussions. Then they proceed to espouse the very racist, eugenicist, et. tal. ideas that they claim to be against this whole time.

Best-of Reddit replies:

Saudigate LOL (and “what are we, a bunch of asians” and all the usual racist shit Reddit casually allows in their decrepit site)…

ok fash

Frankfurt, 2009

Frankfurt, 2025

This is obviously deeply unserious, as usual. It’s pretty easy to “prove” that there are “more immigrants than natives” by just taking a random screenshot of brown people walking down the street. The city at 1st place with the highest proportion of immigrants in Europe is Brussels, sitting at ~35%, then Frankfurt at 2nd place at 29%, if we’re to believe Eurostat. It shouldn’t be hard understand then, that you will see more white people in those cities even after the so-called mass immigration.

It is not, as far as reality is concerned. The “UN Program” mentioned, from what I can see from just the title and preface alone, discusses whether immigrants can mitigate Global North declining populations… History, to these libs, of course started in 2015 when Moroccans, Lybians, Syrians and Iraqis just totally-out-of-nowhere decided it would be radicool to immigrate to Europe and asked Big Europe to teleport them all to Europe, then afterwards proceeded with spreading their ebil gommunist Sharia ideals of replacing the hapless white people who didn’t see it coming.

Settlers, colonialists invading and occupying various Indigenous lands:👍

Immigrants escaping wars, famines and economic downturns as a result of rent-seeking debt traps, etc… all engineered by the imperial West: “Mein Fuhrer, we should enact population control to address the concerns over the fall of the Aryan race!”

damn… I spent more time on this post than what I originally ventured out to do :/…

  • purpleworm [none/use name]@hexbear.netEnglish
    34·
    12 days ago

    And again to be clear, I’m not trying to make a POLITICAL point here. I’m not claiming to know WHY this is happening or WHO is orchestrating it,

    I know fash overestimate how clever they are but geez, way to blow your cover.

  • AssortedBiscuits [they/them]@hexbear.netEnglish
    24·
    12 days ago

    If we choose to entertain the dipshittery of white nationalists seriously, the only reasonable conclusion is that white replacement theory is real and inevitable and the reason why is most white nationalists subscribe to one-drop rule on some level, even among Europeans. If having one (1) POC ancestor disqualifies someone from being really whiteTM, then it stands to reason that the number of white nationalist-certified whiteTM people whose entire ancestry can be traced to Europe and only Europe will be an ever shrinking pool of people. At a certain point, the only real whiteTM people are Europeans living in some village in the Alps whose entire (inbred) ancestors live in that same village for centuries. Every other European will have some non-European ancestor somewhere in their family tree.

    • WrongOnTheInternet [none/use name]@hexbear.netEnglish
      16·
      12 days ago

      Every other European will have some non-European ancestor somewhere in their family tree.

      This is already the case for basically everyone in Spain and Portugal within the last thousand years, and everyone else if you go a bit further back

      • An Original Thought@lemmy.ml
        10·
        12 days ago

        And also I’m failing to see the problem. Who gives a shit where your ancestors came from or where they were born? If they got something you like about them and vice versa then a happy couple (or polycule) is made. Any offspring that result will likely also have whatever positive traits made the first couple/polycule successful in the first place.

        • WrongOnTheInternet [none/use name]@hexbear.netEnglish
          3·
          11 days ago

          Any offspring that result will likely also have whatever positive traits made the first couple/polycule successful in the first place.

          The thing about human evolution in particular is that this doesn’t really work - there is a level of variability at the population level that means you can’t really do trait selection like this for

          For a real life example, schizophrenia is a highly heritable condition. Europe in the 20 the century and Nazi Germany to the greatest extent sterilised or murdered almost everyone diagnosed with schizophrenia, but rates returned to normal within a couple of generations

          But yes you’re entirely right, definitionally everyone alive is a descendent of a thousand generations of bipedal survivors

          However to be sufficiently (((racist))) you have to sort of ignore the common origins of all life

          • An Original Thought@lemmy.ml
            1·
            10 days ago

            there is a level of variability at the population level that means you can’t really do trait selection like this for

            Fair, though I’m admittedly grossly oversimplifying things to make the point of the uselessness of selecting for ancestral geographic descent.

            But yes you’re entirely right, definitionally everyone alive is a descendent of a thousand generations of bipedal survivors

            And in that regard we’re all ancestrally geographically African ^^ Always valuable to remind idiot racists of this

  • fox [comrade/them]@hexbear.netEnglish
    22·
    12 days ago

    Let’s assume they’re not i-am-adolf-hitler here, just a moron. The best way to drop birth rates is to improve the standard of living. People have as many children as they need, and if the state makes them literate and makes birth control available and has robust senior care, job done, 1.5 children per couple. Liquidate all the F35s to pay for the NHS

  • An Original Thought@lemmy.ml
    21·
    12 days ago

    Our ‘native’ population has an average birth rate of 1.44 children per couple.

    Okay but have you considered that anglos are hideous?

  • Runcible [none/use name]@hexbear.netEnglish
    21·
    12 days ago

    these freaks never realize that the reason they can’t normalize this bullshit because it relies on an idea of racial purity and this is pretty much at odds with not being a racist. If you buy into racial purity than great replacement theory is equally valid for everybody, like the monarchies but on a larger scale

  • Bay_of_Piggies [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netEnglish
    19·
    12 days ago

    Why would your demographic be ‘replaced’ if you still make up the majority of the founding population? Yeah, other groups may have more children when they first arrive, but they’re also other groups to each other. It’s stupid and racist to throw every non-white UK person in a big pile and then compare it to the white UK pile. The post ignores the actual whole numbers and just focuses on a context less ratio.

    Also, who fucking cares. It’s just genetics, the culture isn’t be replaced. This is only a problem if you believe in racial purity as in you’re a racist Nazi eugencist. Immigrants are assimilated into the majority, not the other way around, and by the 3rd gen their reproduction rate is the same as the native population because they’re under the same economic pressures that white UK working people’s are.