Okay, how about this: I’ve never heard someone make a cogent argument about how communism actually leads to more poverty. It’s just something about being less efficient than the market. But I’ve seen markets over and over fuck people over our of home, health, and community. More empty homes than homeless people. Meanwhile “I put the homeless person in a home now they’re not homeless” has worked wonders.

I’ve never seen a better litmus a tolerant society than not tolerating intolerant views. Separating inheritance from actions seems perfectly good and I’ve never seen someone say something convincing otherwise.

I’ve seen the dumbest fucking arguments about science, vaccines, and nutrition and now that shit is getting enforced at the end of a barrel. In fact a fuck load of that shit (philosophy, bad data gathering, fallacious rhetoric, just being fucking WRONG) gets to just hang around for no good reason besides having a bigger stick. By definition that’s not been persuasive to me.

What’s up with that?