I am aware that the West’s best time was essentially at the expense of the rest of the world - but where can one find opportunity and prosperity of those times today? Was this a great anomaly of history? Is it time to hedge your bets on living out the Chinese dream?

Is it time for the West to accept that what our parents experienced will never exist again?

Will the world overall need to accept that the western living standard of that time will never be reached again? (It’s too unsustainable - for the planet, and because superprofits won’t flow as they once did)

What has actually happened that’s caused it to collapse?

  • MaoTheLawn [any, any]@hexbear.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Thanks for the insight. How would/should socialism endeavour to solve this problem?

    What do you think are the new stable cash flows? If no ones got money to spend, then I suppose its just inelastic demands like food, shelter, and energy?

    I know Malthusian solutions aren’t be-all solution, but do child caps prove effective in managing this sort of thing at all?

    • adultswim_antifa [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      That is a complex question with many answers. Broadly, profit under capitalism is an accounting thing concerning accumulation of capital. But under socialist economics, if the total societal labor produces more enough to reproduce the labor force and maintain the means of production, then is it a surplus, even when it might be a loss for capitalists, which is actually probably the current state of our civilization because like I said, the government already runs permanent deficits and the federal reserve is also constantly injecting money with quantitative easing, which both raise profits.

      Industry can be run to meet social needs and growth can slow without causing economic crises. Under capitalism, technology which allows us to easily produce all that is needed means less labor is needed and that means less profit, then low investment, low employment, low wages, and stagnation. Under socialism, this grows the surplus because more labor can be directed to other activities.