You must log in or register to comment.
I think the x axis is “year of measurement | year of birth” since they are 8 years apart. Very unconventional and it would need an explanation but it’s not bad to have both pieces of information handy in this context
It looks nepotism put a failson in charge of this graph.
That line of best fit doesn’t even match the data. How can it start above the data and then finish above the data but still be line of best fit. Not that that’s the only problem with this graph of course.
For some reason, that doesn’t look like a GPT-generated graph, which means… sadly… that someone had to make that thing… and somebody had to approve it.
What do you bet it’s not even based on real data and it’s just some random rectangles that they drew.
r/DataIsBlursed
I remember when my mum was filling out a form as part of the autism assessment, she was like “sounds a lot like my husband as well… And his dad”
I’m convinced my mom is on the spectrum and my grandparents
Population size has also experienced dramatic growth… ffs.
That actually doesn’t matter. The stats are per Capita.
Dude…
Didn’t we used to hide it?
deleted by creator
