WhyEssEff [she/her]@hexbear.net to

Slop.@hexbear.netEnglish · 3 months ago

assigning unimpeachable veracity to a document that makes a point to refer to one of its subjects as a "biological male," for what clearly must be no purpose at all

124

assigning unimpeachable veracity to a document that makes a point to refer to one of its subjects as a "biological male," for what clearly must be no purpose at all

WhyEssEff [she/her]@hexbear.net to

Slop.@hexbear.netEnglish · 3 months ago

you think the state would do that? just go out there and fabricate evidence?

Chat

Keld [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
link
fedilink
English
arrow-up
6·
3 months ago
That just means they have hell and double hell.

Slop.@hexbear.net

slop@hexbear.net

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !slop@hexbear.net

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can’t post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances’ admins or moderators.

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

396 users / day
980 users / week
1.58K users / month
3.01K users / 6 months
1 local subscriber
745 subscribers
1.85K Posts
37.3K Comments
Modlog