whatdoiputhere12 [any, he/him]@hexbear.net to politics@hexbear.netEnglish · edit-228 days agoNO MAMDANI NO!hexbear.netimagemessage-square94linkfedilinkarrow-up1162arrow-down14file-text
arrow-up1158arrow-down1imageNO MAMDANI NO!hexbear.netwhatdoiputhere12 [any, he/him]@hexbear.net to politics@hexbear.netEnglish · edit-228 days agomessage-square94linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareBay_of_Piggies [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·27 days agoI don’t think this has actually ever been tested
minus-squareAwoo [she/her]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up27·27 days agoNo way a conservative court is ever allowing it and there’s no way a liberal court is allowing it unless the candidate is a liberal darling.
minus-squareFlyberius [comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·27 days agoThe Dems would only allow it if it were a republican candidate
minus-squareCat_Daddy [any, any]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·27 days ago …and there’s no way a liberal court is allowing it unless the candidate is a liberal darling. FTFY. A liberal court would write a sternly worded letter and wear a RBG dissent collar while making sure to narrowly block it.
DONT LISTEN TO THAT FUCKER DONT LISTEN TO THAT FUCKER
I don’t think this has actually ever been tested
No way a conservative court is ever allowing it and there’s no way a liberal court is allowing it unless the candidate is a liberal darling.
The Dems would only allow it if it were a republican candidate
FTFY. A liberal court would write a sternly worded letter and wear a RBG dissent collar while making sure to narrowly block it.