cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/5744937
The treatlers will never have be exploited by the international bourgeoisie.
Fun fact: women entering the workforce helped Nixon cope with the crisis of profitability known as “stagflation.”
Other German politicians and think tanks have also suggested enticing retirees to return to work, aside from the usual noise of constantly raising the retirement age.
Wanna stop working after doing so all your life? Lazy bum! You’re no TRVE German.
Also just from my personal social circles, all the moms I know are wage-labouring as much as they can. Cost of living isn’t getting any cheaper and family benefits exist but only serve to paper over the gap for a short time. The only things holding working moms back from working more (out of necessity) are lack of childcare and the so-called “part time trap.”
Only more the necessity of neoliberal restructuring!
In place of the formerly widespread custom of gritting one’s teeth all one’s life and invoking Christian maxims to take on oneself the sacrifice for the family as one’s raison d’être, modern-day women have come up with a new ideal. They take the limitations that their functioning for the aggregate private life of society forces upon them as a reason to insist primarily on recognition of their efforts; demands for the remuneration of their managing of the household have been raised, as if the honoring of this service, carried out fairly in accordance accordance with all the principles of equality, would settle everything.
Some other kinds of discoveries have also conformed to ideas of equality; women’s liberation is suddenly supposed to come about by their getting (even more) work — a wish that is granted in keeping with the needs of the labor market, and of course adhering to the unpleasant rules of “performance-based” pay, which many a woman on the General Motors assembly line can tell a tale about. After all, the fact that confining them to hearth and home represents the the sanctioned way of using womenfolk does not mean conversely that their integration into the hierarchy of labor is a blessing. In view of the truth that men have treated women like servants who have nothing to say and know nothing of the ways of the world, it has also become customary to bank on discussions on an equal footing, so that the ideal of competition has been happily wedded to that of democracy, and the two upheld together with great public appeal as a critique of the role of women.
Repression has become the catchphrase that smothers all the special features of relations between the sexes — while the magnificent battle that is ultimately fought by women’s groups and magazines is against men per se, against “male society,” with salvos like, “How many women hold elected office?” It is sad to see how the decision to stop putting up with the costs of private life has become a citizen’s action committee devoted to “I am woman … I can do anything” — to the point of joyous commitment to motherhood as an experience of the most exquisite naturalness! The idea that there is a right to a specifically specifically womanly happiness, the application of the ideal of compensation that men assert toward women by turning it around, the staging of feminine initiative as a special case of “self-fulfillment” — that is all that constitutes the battle of the sexes.
— Psychology of the Private Individual, GegenStandpunkt
