Absolutely, although im gonna be pedantic cause it’s relevant and say ‘manoralism’ is what nerds call the dominant economic structure of the time and feudalism is a subgenre. It is a useful distinction and id like to popularize it. The average guy who thinks theyre smart will say the Muslim world was making massive advances at the time and then usually go on to say they stopped advancing socially at that point because they are racists. Which isn’t only racist but undermines advancements made in Europe at the time which were generally less amazing in scale but power was significantly less centralized at the time in Europe and theres a lot to be said for not living under an empire but some petty noble who doesn’t really give a fuck what you do as long as he gets the grain. Could be a lot of grain but within your own community you would have a much greater effect on politics than you could dream of now unless you were a woman most of the time, unless you were a woman does unfortunately apply to most signs of olde timey progressivism when ideas become law. And even then it could be argued that women had a greater amount of autonomy in a family of farmers and where domestic labor was fucking hard as hell. Serfs getting a lot of days off was real, but those are days off from tending your lord’s field so you can work on your own and handle the absurdly labor intensive versions of basic household shit that people with electricity can do either passively or in 10 minutes. Getting a decent understanding of the transitory period between ancient slave empires and modern capitalism makes historical and dialectal materialism pretty easy to grasp as well as the idea that societies shift from one economic mode to another through class struggle. When these enlightment era whitewashed versions of medieval and early modern periods are known for real it makes Marx way too obviously right to not be whitewashed.
Absolutely, although im gonna be pedantic cause it’s relevant and say ‘manoralism’ is what nerds call the dominant economic structure of the time and feudalism is a subgenre. It is a useful distinction and id like to popularize it. The average guy who thinks theyre smart will say the Muslim world was making massive advances at the time and then usually go on to say they stopped advancing socially at that point because they are racists. Which isn’t only racist but undermines advancements made in Europe at the time which were generally less amazing in scale but power was significantly less centralized at the time in Europe and theres a lot to be said for not living under an empire but some petty noble who doesn’t really give a fuck what you do as long as he gets the grain. Could be a lot of grain but within your own community you would have a much greater effect on politics than you could dream of now unless you were a woman most of the time, unless you were a woman does unfortunately apply to most signs of olde timey progressivism when ideas become law. And even then it could be argued that women had a greater amount of autonomy in a family of farmers and where domestic labor was fucking hard as hell. Serfs getting a lot of days off was real, but those are days off from tending your lord’s field so you can work on your own and handle the absurdly labor intensive versions of basic household shit that people with electricity can do either passively or in 10 minutes. Getting a decent understanding of the transitory period between ancient slave empires and modern capitalism makes historical and dialectal materialism pretty easy to grasp as well as the idea that societies shift from one economic mode to another through class struggle. When these enlightment era whitewashed versions of medieval and early modern periods are known for real it makes Marx way too obviously right to not be whitewashed.