i could be convinced that rhetoric like “social order” is inherently fashy but ultimately it seems like it mostly depends on the broader social context, doesn’t it? i couldn’t tell you a thing about china but it seems like the meaning behind the words probably isn’t the same
i could be convinced that rhetoric like “social order” is inherently fashy but ultimately it seems like it mostly depends on the broader social context, doesn’t it? i couldn’t tell you a thing about china but it seems like the meaning behind the words probably isn’t the same