Are you implying that the “corporate ideals” of allowing people to spew any slurs they want until everyone who dislikes that leaves are better than the ideals of… Not doing that? In the context of that being the only thing I’ve said in this conversation it really does look like that’s what you’re saying and needs some clarification.
Basically all I’m saying is that your last sentence does not help to prove your credibility. You said it in a way as if it was meant to make people believe in what you’re saying, as if it gave weight to the point that you made.
I’m just letting you know that at least for me, it had the opposite effect. I’m not arguing with the rest of your comment.
Yeah ok but then you’re presumably a fairly left wing person who has an immediate negative reaction to anyone citing any job they do for private companies. That’s fine. You weren’t the target audience of it, the free speech absolutist can be assumed to be a right wing corporate bootlicker who does value hierarchy and subject authorities.
Generally I would’ve expected most lefties to pick on marketing being the most evil of departments rather than just “corporations bad”. Almost everyone’s got a job at some sort of company unless they’re in government or charity.
Incidentally, I don’t think there is anyone who would qualify as an authority to you on this topic. The options are either people who’ve done this as a job for private companies or people who have done it as hobbiests, but saying
“I’ve moderated subreddits and forums with millions of members”
Would sound like the stupidest shit ever as an “authority” of the topic.
So really I think there is nobody that could say they have experience on this that would work or be appealing to you.
Are you implying that the “corporate ideals” of allowing people to spew any slurs they want until everyone who dislikes that leaves are better than the ideals of… Not doing that? In the context of that being the only thing I’ve said in this conversation it really does look like that’s what you’re saying and needs some clarification.
Basically all I’m saying is that your last sentence does not help to prove your credibility. You said it in a way as if it was meant to make people believe in what you’re saying, as if it gave weight to the point that you made.
I’m just letting you know that at least for me, it had the opposite effect. I’m not arguing with the rest of your comment.
Yeah ok but then you’re presumably a fairly left wing person who has an immediate negative reaction to anyone citing any job they do for private companies. That’s fine. You weren’t the target audience of it, the free speech absolutist can be assumed to be a right wing corporate bootlicker who does value hierarchy and subject authorities.
Generally I would’ve expected most lefties to pick on marketing being the most evil of departments rather than just “corporations bad”. Almost everyone’s got a job at some sort of company unless they’re in government or charity.
👍❤️
Incidentally, I don’t think there is anyone who would qualify as an authority to you on this topic. The options are either people who’ve done this as a job for private companies or people who have done it as hobbiests, but saying
Would sound like the stupidest shit ever as an “authority” of the topic.
So really I think there is nobody that could say they have experience on this that would work or be appealing to you.
You are indeed free to think about me whatever you like :)
or we could have a conversation