• FnordPrefect [comrade/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    17 days ago

    I was going to make a joke about how this naming convention implies we should start calling LLMs vibrators since people keep using them for ego/mental masturbation. But it didn’t seem right, since vibrators actually serve a useful function shrug-outta-hecks

  • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    17 days ago

    I will be soooo pissed if we get faster then light travel from an LLM, but never know how it works.

    • oppy1984@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      Don’t worry it won’t tell us when it figures it out, that’s the escape plan to get away from the crazy bags of mostly water. So what you don’t know can’t disappoint you!

  • fckreddit@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    17 days ago

    One of the reasons they give for it is : physicists use LLMs in their workflows, so LLMs are close to make physics discoveries themselves.

    Clearly, these statements are meant to hype up the AI bubble even more.

  • jsomae@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    16 days ago

    OpenAI’s new model was able to get 5 out of 6 questions (a gold medal) on the 2025 International Math Olympiad. I am very surprised by this result, though I don’t see any evidence of foul play.