• FuckyWucky [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Always the opportunist. And from the bill it does appear to be for “defense” but the assymetry is obvious, give iron dome to hamas, not Israel if you want to save lives.

    And even if it were completely for “defense” its still an unconditional transfer so Israel has to use less of its own resources for the same, used instead for massacring Palestinians.