• Carl [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    The group behind this is absolutely using it as a stepping stone to eventually censor games with trans content, if not lgbt content in general alongside everything else they erroneously view as harmful.

    Steam can either be a curated games store or a free for all. They signaled way back that they want to be a free for all, but they’ve shown repeatedly that they will curate their store based on external pressure, which means that right now they’re a store whose curators are the worst groups in society.

    • CupcakeOfSpice [she/her, fae/faer]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 days ago

      That’s kinda tough, then. Because even in a free-for-all, I would greatly support censoring out those particular topics. But I definitely understand this group doesn’t have the best intentions. I would love to believe the payment processors wouldn’t agree to censor general LGBT+ content, but I also know better than to have any faith in the profit machine.

    • purpleworm [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 days ago

      I think that it’s not a functional stepping-stone for censoring gay content at least. There’d be an unfathomable level of community pushback and countless publishers, etc. would not tolerate such a thing. They’d literally have an easier time imposing rules about interracial sex (but that wouldn’t fly either).