• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    22 days ago

    I guess we’ll see, but I don’t really see why they wouldn’t bother. I mean it’s a way for state to create a whole bunch of employment.

      • Bronstein_Tardigrade@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 days ago

        Capitalist thinking. A government that will do something to actually help the working class, simply because it helps the working class, is beyond western, imperialist thinking.

        • bort [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 days ago

          China still has to spend its limited resources efficiently. It’d help the working class if they gave everyone in China a million RMB tomorrow, but obviously they can’t and won’t do that.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 days ago

        Halving travel time is not a minimal gain, but more importantly it’s a demonstration of technological prowess. If China has a commercial maglev operating it’s a showcase of things they can build for other countries. It’s important to keep in mind that a lot of countries don’t have well developed HSR systems or much rail at all. If China can now offer building maglev for them which is ahead of what any other country can do.

            • bort [none/use name]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              22 days ago

              Shanghai-Beijing wouldn’t be a demonstration line, it’d be an enormous project.

              The Shanghai Pudong line was a demo and frankly it failed to sell maglev as a concept, mainly because of NIMBY limitations admittedly, that’s the problem I think.

              • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                22 days ago

                It would have to be a big project because you don’t really get the benefits otherwise. The train needs time to accelerate and decelerate, and it’s only worth building a track over a very long distance where it can mostly go in a straight line at top speed.