That’s like saying forensic pathologists must all get off on mutilated corpses. The jury selection would be restricted by them needing to view such material, but there are still people who would be willing to for the sake of getting a just conviction. I’m not sure if this is obvious to you, but there are people whose jobs it is to investigate things like this as it is, and I don’t think it’s reasonable to assume that most of them are just pedos.
soo… in your opinion anyone involved or interested in punishing or otherwise bringing to account perpetrators of CSA is by definition a pedophile themselves?
You’d need a jury comfortable with watching CSAM and we have a word for people like that.
oh yea totally, a jury has never had to deal with a CSAM involved case ever before. this would be the first one ever.
That’s like saying forensic pathologists must all get off on mutilated corpses. The jury selection would be restricted by them needing to view such material, but there are still people who would be willing to for the sake of getting a just conviction. I’m not sure if this is obvious to you, but there are people whose jobs it is to investigate things like this as it is, and I don’t think it’s reasonable to assume that most of them are just pedos.
I’m mostly saying it in jest, my apologies.
soo… in your opinion anyone involved or interested in punishing or otherwise bringing to account perpetrators of CSA is by definition a pedophile themselves?
wacky