Yeah, this was a little bit surprising to me. Dude has been super blue-maga as far as I can remember so beyond the obvious (dude is on the fuckin list) I don’t see why he’d say this.
There have been a lot of needlessly horny parts of his work (including the super uncomfortable part of IT, and no I don’t mean the ethereal murder clown)
Personally, I doubt it. The “client list” and “epstein files” seem to generally refer to people involved in the actual trafficking, and while I’m sure King is a creep, I’m not going to jump to the conclusion that he’s in on the whole operation, ya know?
Wasn’t he a turbo lib last trump admin?
Yeah, this was a little bit surprising to me. Dude has been super blue-maga as far as I can remember so beyond the obvious (dude is on the fuckin list) I don’t see why he’d say this.
There have been a lot of needlessly horny parts of his work (including the super uncomfortable part of IT, and no I don’t mean the ethereal murder clown)
My guess would be he’s on it
Personally, I doubt it. The “client list” and “epstein files” seem to generally refer to people involved in the actual trafficking, and while I’m sure King is a creep, I’m not going to jump to the conclusion that he’s in on the whole operation, ya know?
What other rational reason does he have to turn against it? The man he’s had a personal vendetta against for years is doubtlessly on it
Some fear of too many liberals being implicated?
I don’t have a satisfactory answer for that.
Oh yeah
Total replyguy